International trade law and common mistake: has there really been a satisfactory clarification of what fundamental legal principles apply?

Article

Taylor, Des. 2006. "International trade law and common mistake: has there really been a satisfactory clarification of what fundamental legal principles apply?" International Trade and Business Law Review. 10, pp. 49-67.
Article Title

International trade law and common mistake: has there really been a satisfactory clarification of what fundamental legal principles apply?

ERA Journal ID40442
Article CategoryArticle
Authors
AuthorTaylor, Des
EditorsMoens, Gabriel and Jones, Roger
Journal TitleInternational Trade and Business Law Review
Journal Citation10, pp. 49-67
Number of Pages19
Year2006
Place of PublicationBrisbane, Australia
ISSN1836-8573
Web Address (URL)http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/itbla10&id=55&collection=journals&index=journals/itbla
Abstract

Common Mistake is an important fundamental legal principle. This article examines the recent legal developments arising out of caselaw and considers the impact of same on the clarity of the statements of the fundamental principle.

Keywordsinternational trade law; common mistake; contract law;
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020480308. International trade and investment law
480410. Legal theory, jurisprudence and legal interpretation
480699. Private law and civil obligations not elsewhere classified
Public Notes

File reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/author.

Byline AffiliationsSchool of Law
ISBN0415419645
Book TitleInternational trade and business law review
Permalink -

https://research.usq.edu.au/item/9y2wv/international-trade-law-and-common-mistake-has-there-really-been-a-satisfactory-clarification-of-what-fundamental-legal-principles-apply

Log in to edit

Download files

Accepted Version
Taylor_ITBLR_v10_AV.pdf
File access level: Anyone

  • 2253
    total views
  • 1520
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The Australian consumer law after the first three years - is it a success?
Taylor, Des and McNamara, Noeleen. 2014. "The Australian consumer law after the first three years - is it a success?" Curtin Law and Taxation Review. 1 (1), pp. 96-132.
Not as straightforward as it might appear: an analysis of the problems associated with Article 35 of the UCP 600
Taylor, Des and Tam, Kevin. 2014. "Not as straightforward as it might appear: an analysis of the problems associated with Article 35 of the UCP 600." International Trade and Business Law Review. XVII, pp. 370-391.
Staying focused on the big picture: should Australia legislate for corporate manslaughter based on the United Kingdom model?
Taylor, Des and Mackenzie, Geraldine. 2013. "Staying focused on the big picture: should Australia legislate for corporate manslaughter based on the United Kingdom model?" Criminal Law Journal. 37 (2), pp. 99-113.
Reflections on a critical aspect of CISG-governed international sale of goods transactions: the impact of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements on forum selection
Taylor, Des. 2012. "Reflections on a critical aspect of CISG-governed international sale of goods transactions: the impact of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements on forum selection." International Trade and Business Law Review. 15, pp. 42-59.
European chocolate makes the trade go round (in a most delightful way)
Taylor, Des. 2004. "European chocolate makes the trade go round (in a most delightful way)." CESAA Review. 31, pp. 23-30.
Watch your step!
Taylor, Des. 2001. "Watch your step!" National Accountant. 17 (3), pp. 40-43.
The European Union's approach to legal non-retrospectivity: are there problems for international businesses?
Taylor, Des. 2003. "The European Union's approach to legal non-retrospectivity: are there problems for international businesses?" International Trade and Business Law Annual. 8, pp. 275-299.