Preconception Health of Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review
Article
Walker, Clara, Begum, Tahmina, Boyle, Jacqueline A, Ward, James and Barzi, Federica. 2024. "Preconception Health of Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 21 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030345
| Article Title | Preconception Health of Indigenous Peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: A Scoping Review |
|---|---|
| ERA Journal ID | 44293 |
| Article Category | Article |
| Authors | Walker, Clara, Begum, Tahmina, Boyle, Jacqueline A, Ward, James and Barzi, Federica |
| Journal Title | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
| Journal Citation | 21 (3) |
| Article Number | 345 |
| Number of Pages | 39 |
| Year | 2024 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG |
| Place of Publication | Switzerland |
| ISSN | 1660-4601 |
| 1661-7827 | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030345 |
| Web Address (URL) | https://14 March 2024 |
| Abstract | Background: There is increasing recognition of the importance of the preconception period for addressing reproductive and intergenerational health inequities and supporting improved maternal and child health outcomes. This study aimed to understand the extent and type of evidence that exists in relation to preconception health for Indigenous peoples living in high-income countries with similar experiences of colonisation, namely, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States. Methods: This review was conducted as per the JBI methodology and PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL [EBSCO], Ovid Embase, Scopus, and the Wiley Cochrane Library was conducted using keywords and index terms. We included research in English published between January 2010 and June 2023 on quantitative and qualitative primary studies. Data were extracted using a standardised tool, and the analysis included quantitative descriptions and qualitative content analysis. Results: We identified 360 potential studies and included 57 articles in the review. Most studies were from the United States (n = 36, 63.2%) and Australia (n = 13, 22.8%), and they commonly reported associations between preconception health risk factors and maternal or child health outcomes (n = 27, 48.2%) or described the development, implementation, or evaluation of preconception health interventions (n = 26, 46.4%). Common preconception health areas were pre-pregnancy body mass index or weight (n = 34), alcohol (n = 16), diet (n = 14), physical activity (n = 12), and diabetes (n = 11). Most studies focused exclusively on women (n = 46, 80.7%), and very few included men (n = 3, 5.3%). The study populations were mostly urban and rural (n = 25, 43.9%) or rural only (n = 14, 24.6%); however, the geographical remoteness was often unclear (n = 14, 24.6%). Conclusions: While there was some research relating to the preconception health of Indigenous peoples, this review identified considerable research gaps. There is a need for dedicated research into preconception health risk factors and reproductive health outcomes, attitudes and awareness of preconception health, and preconception health interventions for Indigenous peoples. |
| Keywords | Indigenous health; preconception health; pre-pregnancy |
| Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
| ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 4299. Other health sciences |
| Byline Affiliations | Centre for Health Research |
| University of Queensland | |
| Monash University |
Permalink -
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/z85vy/preconception-health-of-indigenous-peoples-in-australia-canada-new-zealand-and-the-united-states-a-scoping-review
Download files
3
total views1
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month