Factors associated with farmers’ use of fee-for-service advisors in a privatized agricultural extension system

Article


Nettle, R., Morton, J. M., McDonald, N., Suryana, M., Birch, D., Nyengo, K., Mbuli, M., Ayre, M., King, B., Paschen, J.-A. and Reichelt, N.. 2021. "Factors associated with farmers’ use of fee-for-service advisors in a privatized agricultural extension system." Land Use Policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use. 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105360
Article Title

Factors associated with farmers’ use of fee-for-service advisors in a privatized agricultural extension system

ERA Journal ID21007
Article CategoryArticle
AuthorsNettle, R., Morton, J. M., McDonald, N., Suryana, M., Birch, D., Nyengo, K., Mbuli, M., Ayre, M., King, B., Paschen, J.-A. and Reichelt, N.
Journal TitleLand Use Policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use
Journal Citation104
Article Number105360
Number of Pages17
Year2021
PublisherElsevier
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
ISSN0264-8377
1873-5754
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105360
Web Address (URL)https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721000831
Abstract

The privatization of agricultural advisory and extension services in many countries and the associated pluralism of service providers has renewed interest in farmers’ use of fee-for-service advisors. Understanding farmers’ use of advisory services is important, given the role such services are expected to play in helping farmers address critical environmental and sustainability challenges. This paper aims to identify factors associated with farmers’ use of fee-for service advisors and bring fresh conceptualization to this topic. Drawing on concepts from service ecosystems in agricultural innovation and using the theory of planned behavior to define a plausible directed acyclic graph, we conducted a cross-sectional study of 1003 Australian farmers and their use of fee-for service advisors, analyzing data using generalized ordinal logistic regression models. We defined three categories: farmers who used fee-for-service advisors as their main source of advice (‘main source'), farmers who used them but did not consider them their main source of advice (‘non-main source’), and farmers who did not use them (‘non-user’). The factors most strongly associated with use of fee-for-service advisors (both as 'main source' and 'non-main source') were: the farm being in a growth/expanding business stage; behavioral beliefs that paying for advice provides control and helps identify new opportunities in farming; endorsement of paying for advice from others in the farm business and farmer peers; attitudes relating to the benefit and value for money from advice; and perceived behavioral control related to confidence in accessing advice. These findings can inform strategies to enable use of fee-for-service advisors. For example, they highlight the need to increase the social acceptance of paying for advice and to assist advisors to better articulate the value of their services in terms that farmers view as important. Currently, mechanisms for professionalizing and certifying advisory services are a focus for policy makers in enabling farmers’ use of advisors. Our findings indicate that these mechanisms on their own would not necessarily lead to greater use of fee-for-service advice, because use is also based on several social and attitudinal factors in addition to perception of quality. Greater emphasis on the social and attitudinal factors found in this study is required when developing strategies to enable the use of fee-for-service advisors.

KeywordsAdvisory ecosystems; Farmers’ decision making; Theory of planned behavior
Contains Sensitive ContentDoes not contain sensitive content
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020300207. Agricultural systems analysis and modelling
Byline AffiliationsUniversity of Melbourne
Jemora, Australia
University of Southern Queensland
Permalink -

https://research.usq.edu.au/item/zq56z/factors-associated-with-farmers-use-of-fee-for-service-advisors-in-a-privatized-agricultural-extension-system

  • 13
    total views
  • 4
    total downloads
  • 13
    views this month
  • 4
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

A Social Cognitive Career Theory study of agricultural mechanical trade workers
Black, Rebecca, Hoare, P. Nancey, McDonald, Nicole and McIlveen, Peter. 2025. "A Social Cognitive Career Theory study of agricultural mechanical trade workers." Journal of Career Assessment. 33 (1), pp. 32-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727241245962
Development and application of biochemical and haematological reference intervals to identify unhealthy green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas)
Flint, Mark, Morton, John M., Limpus, Colin J., Patterson-Kane, Janet C., Murray, Peter J. and Mills, Paul C.. 2010. "Development and application of biochemical and haematological reference intervals to identify unhealthy green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas)." Veterinary Journal. 185 (3), pp. 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.06.011
Preventive health care of Pony Club horses in rural New South Wales, Australia
Buckley, P., Buckley, D., Coleman, G. T. and Morton, J. M.. 2016. "Preventive health care of Pony Club horses in rural New South Wales, Australia." Australian Veterinary Journal. 94 (8), pp. 265-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12464