The environmental impact of disposable versus re-chargeable batteries for consumer use

Article


Parsons, David. 2007. "The environmental impact of disposable versus re-chargeable batteries for consumer use." International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 12 (3), pp. 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.08.270
Article Title

The environmental impact of disposable versus re-chargeable batteries for consumer use

ERA Journal ID41428
Article CategoryArticle
Authors
AuthorParsons, David
Journal TitleInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Journal Citation12 (3), pp. 197-203
Number of Pages7
Year2007
Place of PublicationGermany
ISSN0948-3349
1614-7502
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.08.270
Web Address (URL)https://link.springer.com/article/10.1065/lca2006.08.270
Abstract

Goal, Scope and Background: The most common system for powering small items of electronics by both consumers and industry in Australia is simply to repeatedly buy and use disposable alkaline batteries. A growing practice however is to invest in a small battery charger and buy more expensive re-chargeables such as nickel metal hydride batteries. This latter course is promoted as being better for the environment. This study evaluates this assertion to guide future practice by both consumers and industry.

The study compares re-chargeable AA batteries of both nickel cadmium (NiCd) and nickel metal hydride (NiMH) chemistry, each used either 400 times or 50 times with the number of AA alkaline batteries required to provide 1 kWh of energy to a device being powered. The scope of the analysis includes the materials and processes used in the production, distribution, use and disposal of the batteries and the battery charger and includes consideration of partial recycling and disposal to landfill.

Methods: The study is done by developing an inventory of the life cycle of each of the alternatives which in the case of re-chargeable batteries includes the charger and the discharge & re-charging process. Measurements were conducted of re-charging efficiencies of representative batteries and of battery charger energy efficiencies. Energy use in wholesale and retail parts of the distribution system are also accounted for. SimaPro LCA software and associated Australian databases are then used to analyse the data using the Eco Indicator 99 (E) model of environmental impact.

Results: The relative impacts of the three alternative systems on the categories human health, ecosystem quality and resource use showed little difference between the NiCd and NiMH batteries except for human health where the toxicity of cadmium gave a 20% advantage to NiMH batteries. When comparing re-chargeable batteries with alkaline batteries, the former caused less damage by factors varying from 10 to 131 for an optimistic scenario of 400 cycles of discharge and charge.

Significant factors in the impact of the re-chargeable batteries were the production of batteries themselves, the electricity used for wholesaling and retailing, the transport to landfill and the copper and other components in the battery charger. For the disposable alkaline batteries the dominant impacts came from the electrical energy used for wholesaling and retailing the batteries, followed by the production of the batteries.

Discussion: Most of the results are in line with expectations but somewhat surprisingly, the impact in most categories is dominated by the energy used in wholesaling and retailing, particularly for the alkaline batteries where the number involved is large. Also surprising is the fact that the cadmium present in the NiCd batteries was less significant than many other factors. The results however agree broadly with those of Lankey & McMichael (2000).

Conclusion: Analysis results were overwhelmingly in favour of the re-chargeable battery option. This was true for every impact criteria studied and for less than optimistic scenarios of battery use such as significant shelf life or high discharge rates.

Recommendation and Perspective: Given the present very large market for disposable batteries in Australia, there is a need for education of the consumer population and, to a lesser extent, industry, of the environmental and economic advantages of moving to re-chargeable batteries.

Keywordsbatteries; consumer; re-chargeable; disposable; alkaline; nickel-metal-hydride; nickel-cadmium; charger; Australia
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020410402. Environmental assessment and monitoring
401102. Environmentally sustainable engineering
400899. Electrical engineering not elsewhere classified
Public Notes

File reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/author.

Byline AffiliationsDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering
Permalink -

https://research.usq.edu.au/item/9xy10/the-environmental-impact-of-disposable-versus-re-chargeable-batteries-for-consumer-use

Download files

  • 5013
    total views
  • 574
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Advancing a farmer decision support tool for agronomic decisions on rainfed and irrigated wheat cropping in Tasmania
Phelan, David C., Harrison, Matthew T., McLean, Greg, Cox, Howard, Pembleton, Keith G., Dean, Geoff J., Parsons, David, do Amaral Richter, Maria E., Pengilley, Georgie, Hinton, Sue J. and Mohammed, Caroline L.. 2018. "Advancing a farmer decision support tool for agronomic decisions on rainfed and irrigated wheat cropping in Tasmania." Agricultural Systems. 167, pp. 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.003
Home heating in temperate Australia
Parsons, David. 2010. "Home heating in temperate Australia ." International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 15 (8), pp. 785-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-010-0184-3
Effects of replacing incandescent lamps with energy saving compact fluroescent lamps
Sharma, R., Parsons, D. and Sippell, B.. 2009. "Effects of replacing incandescent lamps with energy saving compact fluroescent lamps." Zahedi, Ahmad (ed.) 47th Annual Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Solar Energy Society (Solar09). Townsville, Australia 29 Sep - 02 Oct 2009 Townsville, Australia.
The environmental impact of engineering education in Australia
Parsons, David. 2009. "The environmental impact of engineering education in Australia." International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 14 (2), pp. 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0045-5
Is there an alternative to exams? Examination stress in engineering courses
Parsons, David. 2008. "Is there an alternative to exams? Examination stress in engineering courses." International Journal of Engineering Education. 24 (6), pp. 1111-1118.
The environmental impact of compact fluorescent lamps and incandescent lamps for Australian conditions
Parsons, David. 2006. "The environmental impact of compact fluorescent lamps and incandescent lamps for Australian conditions." The Environmental Engineer. 7 (2), pp. 8-14.
Is the internet good for our environment?
Parsons, David. 2006. "Is the internet good for our environment? " Electroline.
Analysing the environmental costs in electronics
Parsons, David. 2006. "Analysing the environmental costs in electronics." Electroline.
Printed circuit board recycling in Australia
Parsons, David. 2007. "Printed circuit board recycling in Australia." Achieving Business Benefits from Managing Life Cycle Impacts (2006). Melbourne, Australia 22 - 24 Nov 2006 Melbourne, Australia.
Semiconductors and the environment
Parsons, David. 2005. "Semiconductors and the environment." What's New in Electronics. 25 (6), pp. 12-13.
Rechargeables have the edge - environmentally
Parsons, David. 2005. "Rechargeables have the edge - environmentally." What's New in Electronics. 25 (5), pp. 40-41.
Encouraging learning through external engineering assessment
Parsons, D.. 2007. "Encouraging learning through external engineering assessment." Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. 13 (2), pp. 21-30.
End-of-life cathode ray tubes: a life cycle assessment for Australia
Parsons, David. 2007. "End-of-life cathode ray tubes: a life cycle assessment for Australia." The Environmental Engineer. 8 (4), pp. 7-13.
The environmental impact of electronics and its incorporation into the curriculum
Parsons, David. 2006. "The environmental impact of electronics and its incorporation into the curriculum." 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2006). Auckland, New Zealand 10 - 13 Dec 2006 Auckland, New Zealand.