Restricting foreign acquisitions of Australian enterprises: who benefits?

Article

Mayanja, James. 2012. "Restricting foreign acquisitions of Australian enterprises: who benefits?" Australian Business Law Review. 40 (6), pp. 398-409.
Article Title

Restricting foreign acquisitions of Australian enterprises: who benefits?

ERA Journal ID33106
Article CategoryArticle
Authors
AuthorMayanja, James
Journal TitleAustralian Business Law Review
Journal Citation40 (6), pp. 398-409
Number of Pages12
Year2012
Place of PublicationSydney, Australia
ISSN0310-1053
Web Address (URL)http://www.westlaw.com.au/maf/wlau/app/document?docguid=I3beec12834f911e28abce6b64809e9e1&tocDs=AUNZ_AU_JOURNALS_TOC&isTocNav=true
Abstract

Takeover transactions, whether initiated by local or foreign entrepreneurs, have the potential to promote and enhance shareholder and social welfare. Considering this, it is arguable that the rules affecting the control of Australian enterprises would serve the interests of investors in companies and the economic order of society generally better if they functioned so as to facilitate takeover activity by all persons operating within the law. The legal regime presently governing foreign takeovers potentially discourages foreign business interests from mounting bids to acquire control of Australian companies. To the extent it does so, current law is apt to hurt social and shareholder welfare. This is undesirable. There is thus need to reform the law, with a view to assisting more foreign takeovers to occur. This paper explores ways in which the law could be improved to achieve this objective.

Keywordstakeovers; foreign business; control
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020350706. International business
350208. Investment and risk management
480699. Private law and civil obligations not elsewhere classified
Public Notes

Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions.

Byline AffiliationsSchool of Law
Institution of OriginUniversity of Southern Queensland
Permalink -

https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q1q4z/restricting-foreign-acquisitions-of-australian-enterprises-who-benefits

Log in to edit
  • 2047
    total views
  • 9
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Of remedies, access to justice, the enforcement of private law and judicial efficiency: the need for a damages claims grouping procedure in all Australian jurisdictions
Mayanja, James. 2016. "Of remedies, access to justice, the enforcement of private law and judicial efficiency: the need for a damages claims grouping procedure in all Australian jurisdictions." Australian Bar Review. 43, pp. 347-362.
Clarifying the object of directors’ endeavours: what Australia can learn from the United Kingdom
Mayanja, James. 2014. "Clarifying the object of directors’ endeavours: what Australia can learn from the United Kingdom." University of New South Wales Law Journal. 37 (3), pp. 874-913.
Why prohibiting creeping takeovers would not be such a good idea
Mayanja, James. 2014. "Why prohibiting creeping takeovers would not be such a good idea." Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 29 (3), pp. 322-341.
Understanding company law by P Lipton and A Herzberg
Mayanja, James. 2002. "Understanding company law by P Lipton and A Herzberg." Insolvency Law Journal. 10, p. 75.
Enhancing private enforcement of Australia's corporate continuous disclosure regime: why unshackling litigation funders makes eminent sense
Mayanja, James. 2010. "Enhancing private enforcement of Australia's corporate continuous disclosure regime: why unshackling litigation funders makes eminent sense." Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 25 (1), pp. 48-69.
The proper role of shareholders in the decision-making processes of modern large Australian public companies
Mayanja, James. 2009. "The proper role of shareholders in the decision-making processes of modern large Australian public companies." Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 24 (1), pp. 9-32.
Promoting enhanced enforcement of directors' fiduciary obligations: the promise of public law sanctions
Mayanja, James. 2007. "Promoting enhanced enforcement of directors' fiduciary obligations: the promise of public law sanctions." Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 20 (2), pp. 157-182.
Reforming Australia's takeover defence laws: what role for target directors? A reply and extension
Mayanja, James. 1999. "Reforming Australia's takeover defence laws: what role for target directors? A reply and extension." Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 10 (2), pp. 162-191.
Directors' duties, business judgment & takeover defences: agenda for reform
Mayanja, James. 1997. "Directors' duties, business judgment & takeover defences: agenda for reform." Corporate and Business Law Journal. 10 (1), pp. 39-67.
Takeover control under the Trade Practices Act: Towards a more efficient and competitive corporate Australia
Mayanja, James. 1998. "Takeover control under the Trade Practices Act: Towards a more efficient and competitive corporate Australia." Trade Practices Law Journal. 6 (1), pp. 33-45.
Enforcing the director's statutory duty to act honestly
Mayanja, James. 1997. "Enforcing the director's statutory duty to act honestly." Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 7 (2), pp. 268-274.
The equal opportunity principle in Australian takeover law and practice: time for review?
Mayanja, James. 2000. "The equal opportunity principle in Australian takeover law and practice: time for review?" Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 12 (1), pp. 1-19.
No-shop, no-talk and break-up fee agreements in merger and takeover transactions: the case for a fresh regulatory approach
Mayanja, James. 2002. "No-shop, no-talk and break-up fee agreements in merger and takeover transactions: the case for a fresh regulatory approach." Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 14 (1), pp. 1-25.
A mandatory bid rule for Australia: an idea whose time has come
Mayanja, James. 2004. "A mandatory bid rule for Australia: an idea whose time has come." Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 16 (3), pp. 205-227.