The great experiment with devolved NRM governance: lessons from community engagement in Australia and New Zealand since the 1980s
Article
Article Title | The great experiment with devolved NRM governance: lessons from community engagement in Australia and New Zealand since the 1980s |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 5805 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Curtis, A. (Author), Ross, H. (Author), Marshall, G. R. (Author), Baldwin, C. (Author), Cavaye, J. (Author), Freeman, C. (Author), Carr, A. (Author) and Syme, G. J. (Author) |
Journal Title | Australasian Journal of Environmental Management |
Journal Citation | 21 (2), pp. 175-199 |
Number of Pages | 25 |
Year | 2014 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
ISSN | 1448-6563 |
2159-5356 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2014.935747 |
Web Address (URL) | http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14486563.2014.935747 |
Abstract | Since the 1980s, natural resource management (NRM) in Australia and New Zealand has been an ambitious experiment with community engagement. Underpinned by theory about public participation, adult education and agricultural extension, but also influenced by neoliberalism's calls for 'smaller government', governments embraced engagement as a cost-effective approach to effecting change. Critiques of community engagement are often misguided as they are frequently based on inauthentic or poor engagement practices. Moreover, these critiques have often failed to grasp the nature of the problems being addressed, acknowledge the contributions of engagement or understand the importance of building adaptive capacity to respond to an increasingly complex and uncertain future. The foundations for this commissioned article emerged at a workshop where we reflected and deliberated on our experience as NRM researchers and practitioners over the past 20 years. We begin by identifying the key theories underpinning community engagement and community-based NRM (CBNRM). We then reflect on the experience with community engagement in NRM over the past 20 years and identify key lessons for practitioners and policy makers. Drawing on these insights, and the developing theory around new governance and resilience thinking, we identify opportunities for community engagement under a range of possible futures. |
Keywords | Catchment management; Community-based NRM; Landcare; Natural resource management; Participation; Participation and Decision-Making; |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 440704. Environment policy |
440708. Public administration | |
440805. Environmental politics | |
Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
Byline Affiliations | Charles Sturt University |
University of Queensland | |
University of New England | |
University of the Sunshine Coast | |
University of Otago, New Zealand | |
Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics | |
Edith Cowan University | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q4376/the-great-experiment-with-devolved-nrm-governance-lessons-from-community-engagement-in-australia-and-new-zealand-since-the-1980s
1295
total views15
total downloads2
views this month0
downloads this month