Coercive diplomacy and the Iranian nuclear crisis
Article
Article Title | Coercive diplomacy and the Iranian nuclear crisis |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 39910 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | |
Author | Harris, Benjamin |
Journal Title | International Negotiation: A Journal of Theory and Practice |
Journal Citation | 26 (2), pp. 218-244 |
Number of Pages | 27 |
Year | 2020 |
Place of Publication | Netherlands |
ISSN | 1382-340X |
1571-8069 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-BJA10008 |
Web Address (URL) | https://brill.com/view/journals/iner/26/2/article-p218_3.xml |
Abstract | Coercive diplomacy was utilized by a coalition of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China and Germany (collectively known as the P5+1) to negotiate an end to the Iranian nuclear crisis from 2002–2013. Eventually, this approach culminated in the Geneva interim agreement and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in November 2013 and October 2015, respectively. This article charts the course of the P5+1’s coercive diplomacy efforts against Iran and demonstrates that coercive diplomacy pressured Iran to a point where the cost of continued resistance was too high to continue enduring. It shows that a combination of factors succeeded after 11 years of a coercive diplomacy strategy. These findings will have implications for policymaking and academia, as it is a rare illustration of successful, coalitional coercive diplomacy. |
Keywords | coercion; crisis management; coalitional diplomacy; nuclear crisis; leadership; incentives |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 440808. International relations |
Byline Affiliations | University of the Sunshine Coast |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q6w37/coercive-diplomacy-and-the-iranian-nuclear-crisis
Download files
306
total views400
total downloads3
views this month8
downloads this month