Soil and Ocean Carbon Sequestration, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage as Negative Emission Strategies for Global Climate Change

Article


Pant, Divya, Shah, Kabita Kumari, Sharma, Sadikshya, Bhatta, Maya, Tripathi, Subina, PandeyHari Prasad, Tiwari, Himanshu, Shrestha, Jiban and Bhat, Ashbin Kumar. 2023. "Soil and Ocean Carbon Sequestration, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage as Negative Emission Strategies for Global Climate Change." Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 23, pp. 1421-1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01215-5
Article Title

Soil and Ocean Carbon Sequestration, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage as Negative Emission Strategies for Global Climate Change

ERA Journal ID201151
Article CategoryArticle
AuthorsPant, Divya, Shah, Kabita Kumari, Sharma, Sadikshya, Bhatta, Maya, Tripathi, Subina, PandeyHari Prasad, Tiwari, Himanshu, Shrestha, Jiban and Bhat, Ashbin Kumar
Journal TitleJournal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Journal Citation23, pp. 1421-1437
Number of Pages17
Year2023
PublisherSpringer
Place of PublicationGermany
ISSN0717-635X
0718-2791
0718-9508
0718-9516
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01215-5
Web Address (URL)https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42729-023-01215-5
Abstract

Carbon is stored in vegetation, soils, woody products, and aquatic habitats through biological carbon sequestration. Biological carbon sequestration requires the implementation of advanced management strategies that enhance the quantity of carbon stored by vegetation (cropland, grassland, forest), soil, ocean, and microorganisms. However, biological carbon sequestration alone cannot achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Carbon capture and storage (CCS), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), direct air capture (DAC), and carbon capture and utilization (CCU) hold the potential for decreasing emissions of greenhouse gasses by lowering the use of fossil fuels and advancing the adoption of clean and sustainable energy sources. CCS, CCU, and DAC approaches can deliver the steep CO2 emissions reductions necessary with the promise of large-scale deployment given strong structural and policy support, research and development, and reduction in cost. Along with human intervention, the definite variation in carbon sequestration capacity of each technology, our best estimations for global negative emission technologies (NETs) potentials based on extensive literature study in 2050 for BECCS, ocean carbon sequestration, biochar, DAC, and soil carbon sequestration is 0.5–5 gigaton of carbon dioxide (GtCO2 yr−1), 2.2 ± 0.4 GtCO2 yr−1, 1–1.8 GtCO2 yr−1, 0.5–5 GtCO2 yr−1, 5.5–6.0 GtCO2 yr−1, respectively. However, to solve climate change, no one single technology can acquire it and the review concluded that a collective deployment of feasible and scalable NETs could help to reduce CO2 emissions and combat climate change.

KeywordsNegative emission technologies ; Direct air capture; Carbon capture and storage ; Soil carbon sequestration; Carbon capture storage; Utilization
Contains Sensitive ContentDoes not contain sensitive content
ANZSRC Field of Research 20203702. Climate change science
Public Notes

Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions.

Byline AffiliationsPennsylvania State University, United States
Tribhuvan University, Nepal
Mississippi State University, United States
Ministry of Forests and Environment, Nepal
Terai Arc Landscape (TAL) Program, Nepal
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, India
Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Nepal
Permalink -

https://research.usq.edu.au/item/z1q85/soil-and-ocean-carbon-sequestration-carbon-capture-utilization-and-storage-as-negative-emission-strategies-for-global-climate-change

  • 10
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 10
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Comparison of Planted Pine versus Natural Mix Forests in Nepal
Maraseni, Tek Narayan, Pandey, Hari Prasad and Pokhrel, Shila. 2024. "Comparison of Planted Pine versus Natural Mix Forests in Nepal ." Forests. 15 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/f15061070
Understanding local ecosystem dynamics in three provinces of the lowlands of Nepal
Pandey, Hari Prasad, Aryal, Kishor, Aryal, Suman and Maraseni, Tek Narayan. 2023. "Understanding local ecosystem dynamics in three provinces of the lowlands of Nepal." Science of the Total Environment. 867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161501
Vegetation loss and recovery analysis from the 2015 Gorkha earthquake (7.8 Mw) triggered landslides
Pandey, Hari Prasad, Gnyawali, Kaushal, Dahal, Kshitij, Pokhrel, Narayan Prasad and Maraseni, Tek Narayan. 2022. "Vegetation loss and recovery analysis from the 2015 Gorkha earthquake (7.8 Mw) triggered landslides." Land Use Policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use. 119, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106185
Status and Practical Implications of Forest Fire Management in Nepal
Pandey, Hari Prasad, Pokhrel, Narayan Prasad, Thapa, Prakash, Paudel, Naya Sharma and Maraseni, Tek Narayan. 2022. "Status and Practical Implications of Forest Fire Management in Nepal." Journal of Forest and Livelihood. 21 (1), pp. 32-45.