'The machine runs itself': law is technology and Australian embryo and human cloning law

Article


Goding, Vincent and Tranter, Kieran. 2021. "'The machine runs itself': law is technology and Australian embryo and human cloning law." Griffith Law Review. 30 (2), pp. 240-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.1901356
Article Title

'The machine runs itself': law is technology and Australian embryo and human cloning law

ERA Journal ID33364
Article CategoryArticle
AuthorsGoding, Vincent and Tranter, Kieran
Journal TitleGriffith Law Review
Journal Citation30 (2), pp. 240-269
Number of Pages30
Year2021
PublisherTaylor & Francis
ISSN1038-3441
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.1901356
Web Address (URL)https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10383441.2021.1901356
AbstractTechnology law scholarship has a tendency towards the dramatic. Technology causes disruption. Law must catch-up; it must ensure potential benefits from technology and avoid potential harms. There are even concerns that law, as an organiser of human life, is itself becoming eclipsed by forms of technological management. What is often not focused on is the practical process through which concerns about technology become transmuted into legal forms within specific jurisdictions. This paper examines the 23 years of Australian law concerning embryos and human cloning. Inspired by Carl Schmitt's criticism of modernity's political institutions and the laws they produce, what is identified is a machine that runs itself. It is shown to be a highly automated process whereby technical experts manage competing values. Rather than law regulating technology or technology regulating law; the Australian study suggests that law and its making, is technological.
KeywordsAustralian embryo and human cloning law; Law and technology; lawmaking; Carl Schmitt; experts; neutralisation
Contains Sensitive ContentDoes not contain sensitive content
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020480405. Law and society and socio-legal research
480504. Legal institutions (incl. courts and justice systems)
480408. Law, science and technology
480410. Legal theory, jurisprudence and legal interpretation
Public NotesThe accessible file is the accepted version of the paper. Please refer to the URL for the published version.
Byline AffiliationsUniversity of the Sunshine Coast
Griffith University
Queensland University of Technology
Permalink -

https://research.usq.edu.au/item/z8xq9/-the-machine-runs-itself-law-is-technology-and-australian-embryo-and-human-cloning-law

Download files


Published Version

Submitted Version
82613053.pdf
File access level: Anyone

  • 5
    total views
  • 3
    total downloads
  • 5
    views this month
  • 3
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Exceptionality, Neoliberalism and Corporations in COVID Times: JobKeeper and the legal shaping of economic order in crisis
Goding, Vincent Reginald Andrew. 2024. Exceptionality, Neoliberalism and Corporations in COVID Times: JobKeeper and the legal shaping of economic order in crisis. PhD Thesis Doctor of Philosoph. University of the Sunshine Coas. https://doi.org/10.25907/00841
The Robot and Human Futures: Visualising Autonomy in Law and Science Fiction
Goding, Vincent and Tranter, Kieran. 2023. "The Robot and Human Futures: Visualising Autonomy in Law and Science Fiction." Law and Critique: journal of critical legal studies. 34 (3), pp. 315-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09360-7
Re: The corporation — re-thinking, re-forming, re-imagining
Peters, Timothy D. and Goding, Vincent. 2022. "Re: The corporation — re-thinking, re-forming, re-imagining." Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 38 (1), pp. 1-4.
COVID, crisis, and unordinary order: A critical analysis of Australia’s JobKeeper wage subsidy scheme as an exceptional measure
Goding, Vincent. 2022. "COVID, crisis, and unordinary order: A critical analysis of Australia’s JobKeeper wage subsidy scheme as an exceptional measure." Jindal Global Law Review. 13 (1), pp. 39-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-022-00166-9
"To repay or not to repay": Directors' duties and the JobKeeper wage subsidy scheme
Goding, Vincent. 2022. ""To repay or not to repay": Directors' duties and the JobKeeper wage subsidy scheme." Australian Law Journal. 96 (12), pp. 869-871.
Introduction
Bartlett, Francesca, Mortensen, Reid and Tranter, Kieran. 2011. "Introduction." Bartlett, Francesca, Mortensen, Reid and Tranter, Kieran (ed.) Alternative Perspectives on Lawyers and Legal Ethics: Reimagining the Profession. United Kingdom. Routledge. pp. 1-10
Grounding legal ethics learning in social scientific studies of lawyers at work
Robertson, Michael and Tranter, Kieran. 2006. "Grounding legal ethics learning in social scientific studies of lawyers at work." Legal Ethics. 9 (2), pp. 210-229.
Introduction
Tranter, Kieran, Bartlett, Francesca, Corbin, Lillian, Mortensen, Reid and Robertson, Michael. 2010. "Introduction." Tranter, Kieran, Bartlett, Francesca, Corbin, Lillian, Mortensen, Reid and Robertson, Michael (ed.) Reaffirming legal ethics: taking stock and new ideas. Abingdon, Oxon. United Kingdom. Routledge. pp. 1-11
The ethics project in legal education [Introduction]
Robertson, Michael, Corbin, Lillian, Tranter, Kieran and Bartlett, Francesca. 2011. "The ethics project in legal education [Introduction]." Robertson, Michael, Corbin, Lillian, Tranter, Kieran and Bartlett, Francesca (ed.) The ethics project in legal education. London, United Kingdom. Routledge. pp. 1-8