Comparisons of Daily Energy Intake vs. Expenditure Using the GeneActiv Accelerometer in Elite Australian Football Athletes
Article
| Article Title | Comparisons of Daily Energy Intake vs. Expenditure Using the GeneActiv Accelerometer in Elite Australian Football Athletes |
|---|---|
| ERA Journal ID | 9783 |
| Article Category | Article |
| Authors | Salagaras, Brie S., Mackenzie-Shalders, Kristen L., Nelson, Maximillian J., Fraysse, Francois, Wycherley, Thomas P., Slater, Gary J., McLellan, Chris, Kumar, Kuldeep and Coffey, Vernon G. |
| Journal Title | Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research |
| Journal Citation | 35 (5), pp. 1273-1278 |
| Number of Pages | 6 |
| Year | 2021 |
| Publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
| Place of Publication | United States |
| ISSN | 1064-8011 |
| 1533-4287 | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003945 |
| Web Address (URL) | https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2021/05000/comparisons_of_daily_energy_intake_vs__expenditure.14.aspx |
| Abstract | To assess validity of the GeneActiv accelerometer for use within an athlete population and compare energy expenditure (EE) with energy and macronutrient intake of elite Australian Football athletes during a competition week. The GeneActiv was first assessed for utility during high-intensity exercise with indirect calorimetry. Thereafter, 14 professional Australian Football athletes (age, 24 ± 4 [SD] y; height, 1.87 ± 0.08 m; body mass, 86 ± 10 kg) wore the accelerometer and had dietary intake assessed via dietitian-led 24-hour recalls throughout a continuous 7 days of competition period (including match day). There was a significant relationship between metabolic equivalents and GeneActiv g·min-1(SEE 1.77 METs; r2= 0.64; p < 0.0001). Across the in-season week a significant difference only occurred on days 3 and 4 (day 3: energy intake [EI] EI 137 ± 31 kJ·kg-1·d-1; 11,763 ± 2,646 kJ·d-1and EE: 186 ± 14 kJ·kg-1·d-1; 16,018 ± 1973 kJ·d-1; p < 0.05; d = -1.4; day 4: EI: 179 ± 44 kJ·kg-1·d-1, 15,413 ± 3,960 kJ·d-1and EE: 225 ± 42 kJ·kg-1·d-1; 19,313 ± 3,072 kJ·d-1; d = -0.7). Carbohydrate intake (CI) was substantially below current sports nutrition recommendations on 6 of 7 days with deficits ranging from -1 to -7.2 g·kg-1·d-1(p < 0.05), whereas daily protein and fat intake was adequate. In conclusion, the GeneActiv provides effective estimation of EE during weekly preparation for a professional team sport competition. Australian Footballers attempt to periodize dietary EI to varying daily training loads but fail to match expenditure on higher-training load days. Specific dietary strategies to increase CI may be beneficial to achieve appropriate energy balance and macronutrient distribution, particularly on days where athletes undertake multiple training sessions. |
| Keywords | dietary periodization; carbohydrate; energy balance; energy availability |
| Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
| ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 420799. Sports science and exercise not elsewhere classified |
| Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
| Byline Affiliations | Bond University |
| University of South Australia | |
| University of the Sunshine Coast | |
| School of Health and Medical Sciences |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/zq4wz/comparisons-of-daily-energy-intake-vs-expenditure-using-the-geneactiv-accelerometer-in-elite-australian-football-athletes
49
total views0
total downloads4
views this month0
downloads this month