Trends in the environmental impacts of the Australian pork industry

Article


Wiedemann, S.G., Watson, K., Biggs, L., McGahan, E.J. and Copley, M.A.. 2024. "Trends in the environmental impacts of the Australian pork industry." Animal Production Science. 64 (15). https://doi.org/10.1071/AN23361
Article Title

Trends in the environmental impacts of the Australian pork industry

ERA Journal ID5178
Article CategoryArticle
AuthorsWiedemann, S.G., Watson, K., Biggs, L., McGahan, E.J. and Copley, M.A.
Journal TitleAnimal Production Science
Journal Citation64 (15)
Article NumberAN23361
Number of Pages20
Year2024
PublisherCSIRO Publishing
ISSN0816-1089
1836-0939
1836-5787
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1071/AN23361
Web Address (URL)https://www.publish.csiro.au/AN/AN23361
Abstract

Context
Over the past four decades, major changes have occurred in Australia’s pork industry, affecting productivity and environmental performance.

Aims
This study determined long-term changes in greenhouse gas and key resource use efficiency indicators.

Methods
Life cycle assessment was used to determine impacts at decadal intervals between 1980 and 2010, and are presented alongside results for 2020 and 2022.

Key results
Over 42 years since 1980, greenhouse gas emissions, excluding land use and direct land use change (dLUC), fell by 74% from 11.7 to 3.0 kg CO2-e/kg liveweight. Land use and dLUC emissions declined by 92%. Fossil energy use decreased from 35 to 13 MJ/kg liveweight between 1980 and 2022. Freshwater consumption and water stress fell from 506 L and 671 L H2O-e in 1980 to 52 L and 43 L H2O-e/kg liveweight in 2022, respectively. Land occupation decreased by 42% from 22 m2/kg liveweight in 1980 to 13 m2/kg liveweight in 2022. Over the analysis period, emissions per kilogram of liveweight fell by an average of 1.8% per year, land use and dLUC emissions by 2.2%, greenhouse gas including land use and dLUC emissions by 1.9%, fossil energy use by 1.5%, and freshwater consumption, stress, and land occupation by 2.1%, 2.2%, and 1%, respectively. Between 2010 and 2020, uptake of covered anaerobic ponds resulted in an annual rate of improvement in emissions (excl. land use and dLUC) of 2.9%, however, the rate of improvement fell to 1.4% between 2020 and 2022.

Conclusions
Long-term improvements were principally driven by improved herd productivity and feed production systems, and changes in housing and manure management. Herd and system efficiencies led to better feed conversion ratio, resulting in lower feed requirements, reduced manure production and lower feed wastage, which reduced manure greenhouse gas emissions. Concurrently, reduced tillage, higher yields, and a decrease in the proportion of irrigation water used for grain production resulted in lower impacts of feed grains.

Implications
Ongoing changes and improvements in production efficiency have resulted in large gains in environmental performance in the Australian pork industry but new strategies will also be needed to maintain these trends into the future.

Keywordsagricultural systems; carbon footprint; energy; greenhouse gases; reenhouse gas emission; land use change; life cycle assessment; pigs; pork; water
Contains Sensitive ContentDoes not contain sensitive content
ANZSRC Field of Research 20203002. Agriculture, land and farm management
Public Notes

Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions.

Byline AffiliationsIntegrity Ag and Environment, Australia
Centre for Sustainable Agricultural Systems
Permalink -

https://research.usq.edu.au/item/zqz54/trends-in-the-environmental-impacts-of-the-australian-pork-industry

  • 2
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Evaluating sublethal anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in deceased predatory birds of South-East Queensland, Australia
Low, Zachary, Murray, Peter J., Naseem, Noman, McGilp, Daniel, Doneley, Bob, Beale, David J., Biggs, Leo and Gonzalez-Astudillo, Viviana. 2024. "Evaluating sublethal anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in deceased predatory birds of South-East Queensland, Australia ." Discover Toxicology. 1 (13). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44339-024-00016-4
Current and future agricultural practices and technologies which affect fuel efficiency
Biggs, Leo and Giles, David. 2013. Current and future agricultural practices and technologies which affect fuel efficiency. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29336.70402
Trends in environmental impacts from the pork industry: final report
Watson, Kailinda, Wiedemann, Stephen, Biggs, Leo and McGahan, Eugene. 2018. Trends in environmental impacts from the pork industry: final report. Australia. Department of Agriculture and Water Resources. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15938.22727
Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Garments through Industrially Scalable Closed-Loop Recycling: Life Cycle Assessment of a Recycled Wool Blend Sweater
Wiedemann, Stephen G., Biggs, Leo, Clarke, Simon J. and Russell, Stephen J.. 2022. "Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Garments through Industrially Scalable Closed-Loop Recycling: Life Cycle Assessment of a Recycled Wool Blend Sweater." Sustainability. 14 (3), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031081
Reducing environmental impacts from garments through best practice garment use and care, using the example of a Merino wool sweater
Wiedemann, Stephen G., Biggs, Leo, Nguyen, Quan V., Clarke, Simon J., Laitala, Kirsi and Klepp, Ingun G.. 2021. "Reducing environmental impacts from garments through best practice garment use and care, using the example of a Merino wool sweater." International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 26 (6), pp. 1188-1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01909-x
Effect of methodological choice on the estimated impacts of wool production and the significance for LCA-based rating systems
Wiedemann, Stephen G., Simmons, Aaron, Watson, Kalinda J.L. and Biggs, Leo. 2018. "Effect of methodological choice on the estimated impacts of wool production and the significance for LCA-based rating systems." International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 24 (5), pp. 848-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1538-5
Environmental impacts associated with the production, use, and end-of-life of a woollen garment
Wiedemann, S. G., Biggs, L., Nebel, B., Bauch, K., Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G., Swan, P. G. and Watson, K.. 2020. "Environmental impacts associated with the production, use, and end-of-life of a woollen garment." International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 25 (8), pp. 1486-1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01766-0
Life cycle assessment of two Australian pork supply chains
Wiedemann, Stephen, McGahan, Eugene, Grist, Shelly and Grant, Tim. 2010. "Life cycle assessment of two Australian pork supply chains." Notarnicola, Bruno, Settanni, Ettore, Tassielli, Giuseppe and Giungato, Pasquale (ed.) 7th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2010). Bari, Italy 22 - 24 Sep 2010 Bari, Italy.
Drying rate and damage to navy beans
Radajewski, W., Jensen, T., Abawi, G. Y. and McGahan, E. J.. 1992. "Drying rate and damage to navy beans." Transactions of the ASABE. 35 (2), pp. 583-590.
Environmental assessment of two pork supply chains using life cycle assessment
Wiedemann, Stephen, McGahan, Eugene, Grist, Shelly and Grant, Tim. 2010. Environmental assessment of two pork supply chains using life cycle assessment. Barton, ACT, Australia. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.