Death on the table: how do operating room staff experience intraoperative deaths? A narrative synthesis of qualitative evidence
Article
| Article Title | Death on the table: how do operating room staff experience intraoperative deaths? A narrative synthesis of qualitative evidence |
|---|---|
| ERA Journal ID | 210206 |
| Article Category | Article |
| Authors | Bayuo, Jonathan, Akortiakumah, John, Abboah‑Offei, Mary and Salifu, Yakubu |
| Journal Title | BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
| ISSN | 2045-435X |
| 2045-4368 | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005766 |
| Web Address (URL) | https://spcare.bmj.com/content/early/2025/12/17/spcare-2025-005766 |
| Abstract | Background Intraoperative deaths, though statistically rare, may evoke varied emotions among operating room (OR) staff that remain underrecognized and inadequately addressed. Aim To synthesise the qualitative evidence regarding experiences of OR staff following patient death in the OR. A secondary aim is to unpack strategies to support OR staff following an intraoperative death experience. Design Narrative review of qualitative studies. Data sources Peer-reviewed databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Review Library) and grey literature sources (such as thesis databases) were extensively searched for peer-reviewed primary studies and non-peer-reviewed literature respectively reporting on intraoperative deaths or deaths occurring in the OR. Results Six studies were retained. The synthesis revealed that unexpected OR deaths or those deaths perceived as sudden or preventable evoked more severe and enduring psychological repercussions, marked by guilt, hypervigilance, emotional and moral distress. In contrast, anticipated fatalities, particularly in patients with advanced illness, evoked less intense emotions but did not eliminate emotional tolls. The findings revealed divergent coping mechanisms among OR professionals: surgeons often engaged in meaning-making or employed emotion-focused and problem-focused strategies to process loss. In contrast, anaesthetists described emotional desensitisation over time. Nurses, meanwhile, navigated a pervasive culture of silence. Conclusion The emotional toll captured underscores urgent needs for interventions, such as team-based debriefing support, alongside systemic reforms to normalise vulnerability and integrate emotional stewardship into institutional policies.Addressing this is not only ethically imperative but critical to sustaining a resilient workforceand ensuring patient safety in an era of escalating surgical demand. |
| Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
| ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 420316. Palliative care |
| 420599. Nursing not elsewhere classified | |
| Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
| Byline Affiliations | School of Nursing and Midwifery - Nursing and Midwifery |
| University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ghana | |
| University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom | |
| Lancaster University, United Kingdom |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/100xwv/death-on-the-table-how-do-operating-room-staff-experience-intraoperative-deaths-a-narrative-synthesis-of-qualitative-evidence
37
total views0
total downloads7
views this month0
downloads this month