Designing for diversity: a case study exploring implications of ecological psychology for inclusion
Article
Article Title | Designing for diversity: a case study exploring implications of ecological psychology for inclusion |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 200042 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | |
Author | Finn, Roxanne |
Journal Title | International Journal of Learner Diversity and Identities |
Journal Citation | 19 (2), pp. 45-58 |
Number of Pages | 14 |
Year | 2013 |
Place of Publication | Champaign, IL. United States |
ISSN | 2327-0128 |
2327-2627 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0128/cgp/v19i02/48531 |
Web Address (URL) | https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/works/designing-for-diversity |
Abstract | The dominant psychological paradigm which underpins institutionalised learning has perpetuated a deficit rationality whereby children outside of normative developmental ranges are understood to be needy of catch-up or compensatory programs. This perennial approach magnifies and perpetuates difference, seemingly rendering the concept of inclusion in school contexts fallacious. This case study will exemplify an alternative way for schools to nurture and implicitly include young people and their families in a community of practice (Lave & Wenger, 1991). The Studio Learning Project (SLP) was established to create an additional space for learning which allows children the freedom to engage in self-instigated or negotiated projects. Reconceptualising learning from an ecological perspective, as a transaction between actors and their environments, the study supports giving increased consideration to learning as an individual-environment transaction (Barab & Roth, 2006). This places the management of resources and design of learning spaces at the forefront of decision-making for schools and their communities concerned with inclusive education. Kalantzis and Cope (2008) have claimed that designing for learning is the new work of teaching. Ecological psychology describes effectivities and affordance networks (Barab & Roth, 2006; Barab & Plucker, 2002) which transcend the individualistic focus of the dominant theoretical paradigm affecting schools, and suggest the environment and its physical, temporal, and social resources are cause for exploration when it comes to inclusive education. |
Keywords | alternative education; ecological psychology; inclusive education; learning environments; parent and community engagement in schools; personalising learning; student-centred learning; transformative learning |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 520102. Educational psychology |
390409. Learning sciences | |
390411. Special education and disability | |
Public Notes | © 2013 (individual papers), the author. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the applicable copyright legislation, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publisher. |
Byline Affiliations | Faculty of Education |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q214v/designing-for-diversity-a-case-study-exploring-implications-of-ecological-psychology-for-inclusion
Download files
2417
total views214
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month