Mapping approaches to community engagement for preparedness in Australia

Project report


Johnston, Kim, Ryan, Barbara and Taylor, Maureen. 2019. Mapping approaches to community engagement for preparedness in Australia. East Melbourne, Australia. Bushfire and Natural Hazards Co-operative Research Centre.
Title

Mapping approaches to community engagement for preparedness in Australia

Report TypeProject report
AuthorsJohnston, Kim (Author), Ryan, Barbara (Author) and Taylor, Maureen (Author)
Institution of OriginQueensland University of Technology
Number of Pages138
SeriesBNHCRC 2019 Tactical Research Fund Project
Year2019
PublisherBushfire and Natural Hazards Co-operative Research Centre
Place of PublicationEast Melbourne, Australia
Web Address (URL)https://www.bnhcrc.com.au/resources/presentation-slideshow/6066
Abstract

[Executive Summary]:

Getting Australians ready for a natural hazard has taken on a new imperative during the year this project was undertaken. Tasmania and Queensland were subject to unprecedented summer temperatures and suffered damaging bushfires in ecologies that were thought to be permanently safe from fire damage. Queensland then underwent a cascading series of bushfires, cyclones and floods, that saw the media team activated for three solid months. Agencies are actively accounting for climate change in their planning and successful preparedness programs are now more important than ever.

This project was designed to map the community engagement for preparedness approaches Australian agencies are currently using and to use this picture to develop closer linkages from frameworks to practice. It was a six-stage project: a literature review, interviews with agency community engagement practitioners and managers, design of a framework that accounted for their approach and then presentation of a toolkit that allowed implementation at grass roots level of the framework, and evaluation of this work.

The literature review confirmed that getting people to prepare for a natural hazard is difficult, even in places where hazards are regular and expected. People living in cyclone-prone areas tended to be better prepared and preparation was considered a social norm in these areas, but still there were large segments of the community who did not register risk or act on a threat. People in bushfire prone areas tended to be the worst prepared, and in particular, people in urban areas, and wildland/urban interfaces. A number of obstacles to preparing emerged from the literature. Key was failure to fully personalise a risk, even when the risk is accepted as likely. The business of day to day lives, cost, fear of being seen to over-react, weighing up likelihood against effort, optimism bias and being overwhelmed by the volume of tasks involved in preparing all have an influence, along with situational factors such demographics and life stage, on hazard preparation.

The literature also showed that community engagement in emergency management covers the whole spectrum of communication, engagement and participation, and that interpretation was used by practitioners used to cover all of these methods of interaction with the community. Therefore the term ‘community engagement’ was used to refer to work by engagement and communication teams concerned with preparedness for natural hazards.

Our interviews with practitioners explored what preparedness looks like, barriers and enablers of preparedness, what competencies exist in a prepared community and how they and their agency ‘do’ community engagement. We also touched on what they thought was best practice in the field and what framework/s they use to guide their practice. Practitioners told us that most of them work to the IAP2-based Australian Institute of Disaster Resilience Handbook 6 framework, usually with additions and alterations. Co-design and community development approaches emerged as a goal for many practitioners.

We found a wide range of approaches, usually driven by resourcing and skills. Some smaller states with very small teams undertake information delivery engagement practices, while other small teams have highly organised community capacity-building programs embedded in their organisation’s strategic planning. Several larger organisations are doing community engagement in a measurably successful way. They show that it is possible to get year on year improvements to preparedness levels, as well as illustrating programmed methods of achieving this.

Our interviews gave us rich information from which we were able to build the following model containing five steps, and with three additional different layers. The first overlay features the aims of each step; the second explains the tactics associated with each step; and the third explains and guides the research, monitoring, evaluation and learning that permeates every aspect of the model. The fifth dimension of the model, and a key deliverable of this project, is a competency index, which connects the characteristics of the community with the different stages of the model. We’ve called the model the Australian generative model of community engagement for preparedness – the diagram below shows the basic framework.

Following development of the model, we undertook a systematic literature review to determine the effect of checklist preparedness activities for personal safety and coping during a hazard’s impact and recovery phases. We used accepted systematic literature review standards and checked these against the Campbell Collaboration’s method of systematic literature reviews, and in our first round of searching found 1,451 articles. These were sorted on title, and a further 1,328 excluded. After abstract and full text screening, not one article remained that attempted to examine the effect of discrete or groups of preparedness activities.

What we did find from the systematic literature review was a series of community engagement interventions that had been tested in an academic setting and published in both peer reviewed and grey literature. From this data we were able to compile a toolkit of community engagement techniques that had been tested in an emergency management preparedness setting.

At this point we were able to take the model to workshops of agency, local government and not for profit practitioners in the preparedness space. With their guidance, we were able to simplify the presentation of the model and consider aspects of the model that would or wouldn’t work in practice. The workshops provided an iterative platform, with the model and the workshop materials evolving from the first workshop to the second. We expect the framework to evolve as practitioners mould it to suit and explain their approaches to community engagement for preparedness.

Evaluation was an important concept that emerged from the literature review, the interviews with practitioners and the systematic literature review, and has been identified as problematic by respected researchers Gilbert, Elsworth and Rhodes and their colleagues since 2007 (Gilbert, 2007; Elsworth, Gilbert & Rhodes, 2009; Gilbert, Elsworth, Stevens, Rowe & Robinson, 2010; Rhodes, Gilbert, Nelson and Preece, 2011). From these information sources and from community engagement evaluation literature, we also developed a Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit as a companion to the Community Engagement Toolkit. Both of these toolkits are separate documents within the project. Both are documents are designed to cater for entry level practitioners upward.

This project has provided a platform for advancement of Australian practice in community engagement for preparedness. It has allowed us to map approaches and competencies that have potential to clarify the community engagement planning process. It supports the matching of CE approaches and techniques to community competencies and characteristics, and provides guidance on evaluation.

We have also provided a series of recommendations on community engagement practice and further research ideas that we think will further advance efforts to get Australians ready for natural hazards.

Keywordshazards, preparedness, get ready, bushfire, cyclone, flood, hurricane, typhoon, earthquake, preparation, emergency agencies, disaster
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020470101. Communication studies
Public Notes

A report for the Bushfire and Natural Hazards Co-operative Research Centre.

Supported by NSW State Emergency Service (lead partner), Inspector-General of Emergency Management Queensland, Department of Fire and Emergency Services WA, Queensland Fire and Emergency Services, Cairns Regional Council, Ipswich City Council and Tablelands Regional Council.

Byline AffiliationsQueensland University of Technology
School of Humanities and Communication
University of Technology Sydney
Permalink -

https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q550v/mapping-approaches-to-community-engagement-for-preparedness-in-australia

  • 291
    total views
  • 24
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Learning from the experiences of residents: January to July 2022 floods
Taylor, Mel, Miller, Fiona, Johnston, Kim, Ryan, Barbara, Lane, Anne, King, Rachel, Narwal, Harriet, Miller, Madeleine, Simon, Helga and Dabas, Dipika. 2023. "Learning from the experiences of residents: January to July 2022 floods." The Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 38 (3), pp. 27-30.
A Community Engagement Approach to Natural Hazard Communication
Taylor, Maureen, Johnston, Kim A. and Ryan, Barbara. 2023. "A Community Engagement Approach to Natural Hazard Communication ." Coombs, W. Timothy and Holladay, Sherry J. (ed.) The Handbook of Crisis Communication. United States. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 327-342
Using an inventory cluster approach for assessing bushfire preparedness and information needs in vulnerable communities
Ryan, Barbara, King, Rachel, Lokuge, Weena, Karunasena, Warna and Anderson, Esther. 2023. "Using an inventory cluster approach for assessing bushfire preparedness and information needs in vulnerable communities." Natural Hazards. 115, p. 1697–1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05614-2
Recognising and measuring competency in natural hazard preparation: A preparedness competency index
Ryan, Barbara, Johnston, Kim A. and Taylor, Maureen. 2022. "Recognising and measuring competency in natural hazard preparation: A preparedness competency index." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 73, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102882
Evacuation versus shelter in place
McLennan, Jim, Bearman, Chris and Ryan, Barbara. 2022. "Evacuation versus shelter in place." McGee, Tara K. and Penning-Rowsell, Edmund (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Environmental Hazards and Society. Routledge. pp. 335-350
Engaging communities to prepare for natural hazards: a conceptual model
Johnston, Kim A., Taylor, Maureen and Ryan, Barbara. 2022. "Engaging communities to prepare for natural hazards: a conceptual model." Natural Hazards. 112, pp. 2831-2851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05290-2
Bushfire mitigation and preparation on the Toowoomba Region Escarpment: a research report for Toowoomba Regional Council
Ryan, Barbara, King, Rachel, Lokuge, Weena, Karunasena, Karu and Anderson, Esther. 2020. Bushfire mitigation and preparation on the Toowoomba Region Escarpment: a research report for Toowoomba Regional Council. Toowoomba, Australia. University of Southern Queensland.
Community engagement for disaster preparedness: a systematic literature review
Ryan, Barbara, Johnston, Kim A., Taylor, Maureen and McAndrew, Ryan. 2020. "Community engagement for disaster preparedness: a systematic literature review." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101655
The missing link in emergency management: evaluating community engagement
Taylor, Maureen, Ryan, Barbara and Johnston, Kim. 2020. "The missing link in emergency management: evaluating community engagement." The Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 35 (1), pp. 45-52.
How ready is ready? Measuring physical preparedness for severe storms
Ryan, Barbara and King, Rachel. 2020. "How ready is ready? Measuring physical preparedness for severe storms." Natural Hazards. 104, pp. 171-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04164-9
Emergency management communication: The paradox of the positive in public communication for preparedness
Johnston, Kim A., Taylor, Maureen and Ryan, Barbara. 2020. "Emergency management communication: The paradox of the positive in public communication for preparedness." Public Relations Review. 46 (2), pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101903
Should we leave now? Behavioral factors in evacuation under wildfire threat
McLennan, Jim, Ryan, Barbara, Bearman, Chris and Toh, Keith. 2019. "Should we leave now? Behavioral factors in evacuation under wildfire threat." Fire Technology. 55 (2), pp. 487-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0753-8
Toowoomba escarpment residents’ preparedness for storm and bushfire, and their understanding of bushfire preparedness engagement.
Ryan, Barbara and King, Rachel. 2017. Toowoomba escarpment residents’ preparedness for storm and bushfire, and their understanding of bushfire preparedness engagement. Toowoomba, Australia. University of Southern Queensland.
A model to explain information seeking behaviour by individuals in the response phase of a disaster
Ryan, Barbara. 2018. "A model to explain information seeking behaviour by individuals in the response phase of a disaster." Library and Information Science Research. 40 (2), pp. 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.05.001
Establishing information seeking pathways in slow and flash floods
Ryan, Barbara. 2018. "Establishing information seeking pathways in slow and flash floods." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 31, pp. 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.005
The significance of communication in emergency management: what’s changed since 2010?
Ryan, Barbara. 2017. "The significance of communication in emergency management: what’s changed since 2010?" The Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 32 (1), pp. 24-31.
Assessing regional digital competence: Digital futures and strategic planning implications
Alam, Khorshed, Erdiaw-Kwasie, Michael, Shahiduzzaman, Md and Ryan, Barbara. 2018. "Assessing regional digital competence: Digital futures and strategic planning implications." Journal of Rural Studies. 60, pp. 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.02.009
Does measurement of intentions allow us to assume behavior? A disaster information seeking perspective
Ryan, Barbara. 2013. "Does measurement of intentions allow us to assume behavior? A disaster information seeking perspective." International Research Committee on Disasters Annual Meeting (2013). Broomfield, United States 16 Jul 2013 Boulder CO USA.
Information seeking in a flood
Ryan, Barbara. 2013. "Information seeking in a flood." Disaster Prevention and Management: an international journal. 22 (3), pp. 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-05-2012-0059
Information seeking in a disaster
Ryan, Barbara. 2012. "Information seeking in a disaster." Sison, Mariane D. and Sheehan, Mark (ed.) 2012 World Public Relations Forum Research Colloquium. Melbourne, Australia 18 - 20 Nov 2012 Melbourne, Australia.
How people seek information when their community is in a disaster
Ryan, Barbara. 2011. "How people seek information when their community is in a disaster." Emergency Media and Public Affairs: Partnering with the Media (2011). Canberra, Australia 10 - 12 Apr 2011 Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, Australia.
Crisis preparedness in government departments in Australia
Ryan, Barbara. 2009. "Crisis preparedness in government departments in Australia." 2009 Emergency Media and Public Affairs Conference: Engaging in Emergencies. Melbourne, Australia 24 - 26 May 2009 Melbourne, Australia.
Significance of communication in emergency management
Ryan, Barbara and Matheson, Amalia. 2010. "Significance of communication in emergency management." The Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 25 (1), pp. 54-57.
Just what is the significance of communication in emergency management? An attempt to find empirical evidence by content analysis of reviews and debriefs of Australian emergency incidents and exercises
Ryan, Barbara and Matheson, Amalia. 2009. "Just what is the significance of communication in emergency management? An attempt to find empirical evidence by content analysis of reviews and debriefs of Australian emergency incidents and exercises." 2009 Emergency Media and Public Affairs Conference: Engaging in Emergencies. Melbourne, Australia 24 - 26 May 2009 Melbourne, Australia.
How can the corporate sector concepts of 'reputation' and 'trust' be used by local government? A study to establish a model of reputation management for local government
Ryan, Barbara. 2007. "How can the corporate sector concepts of 'reputation' and 'trust' be used by local government? A study to establish a model of reputation management for local government." Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal. 8, pp. 37-75.