Animal Harms and Food Production: Informing Ethical Choices
Article
Article Title | Animal Harms and Food Production: Informing Ethical Choices |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 200143 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Hampton, Jordan O. (Author), Hyndman, Timothy H. (Author), Allen, Benjamin L. (Author) and Fischer, Bob (Author) |
Journal Title | Animals |
Journal Citation | 11 (5), pp. 1-40 |
Article Number | 1225 |
Year | 2021 |
Publisher | MDPI AG |
Place of Publication | Switzerland |
ISSN | 2076-2615 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051225 |
Web Address (URL) | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1225 |
Abstract | Consideration of animal welfare in food choices has become an influential contemporary theme. Traditional animal welfare views about food have been largely restricted to direct and intentional harms to livestock in intensive animal agriculture settings. However, many harms to animals arising from diverse food production practices in the world are exerted indirectly and unintentionally and often affect wildlife. Here we apply a qualitative analysis of food production by considering the breadth of harms caused by different food production systems to wild as well as domestic animals. Production systems are identified that produce relatively few and relatively many harms. The ethical implications of these findings are discussed for consumers concerned with the broad animal welfare impacts of their food choices. Ethical food choices have become an important societal theme in post-industrial countries. Many consumers are particularly interested in the animal welfare implications of the various foods they may choose to consume. However, concepts in animal welfare are rapidly evolving towards consideration of all animals (including wildlife) in contemporary approaches such as 'One Welfare'. This approach requires recognition that negative impacts (harms) may be intentional and obvious (e.g., slaughter of livestock) but also include the under-appreciated indirect or unintentional harms that often impact wildlife (e.g., land clearing). This is especially true in the Anthropocene, where impacts on non-human life are almost ubiquitous across all human activities. We applied the 'harms' model of animal welfare assessment to several common food production systems and provide a framework for assessing the breadth (not intensity) of harms imposed. We considered all harms caused to wild as well as domestic animals, both direct effects and indirect effects. We described 21 forms of harm and considered how they applied to 16 forms of food production. Our analysis suggests that all food production systems harm animals to some degree and that the majority of these harms affect wildlife, not livestock. We conclude that the food production systems likely to impose the greatest overall breadth of harms to animals are intensive animal agriculture industries (e.g., dairy) that rely on a secondary food production system (e.g., cropping), while harvesting of locally available wild plants, mushrooms or seaweed is likely to impose the least harms. We present this conceptual analysis as a resource for those who want to begin considering the complex animal welfare trade-offs involved in their food choices. |
Keywords | agriculture; animal welfare; ethics; harms; harvesting; hunting; ranking; wildlife |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 410407. Wildlife and habitat management |
300306. Animal welfare | |
Byline Affiliations | Murdoch University |
Institute for Life Sciences and the Environment | |
University of Texas, United States | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q6z44/animal-harms-and-food-production-informing-ethical-choices
Download files
143
total views112
total downloads3
views this month2
downloads this month