Respect for juries: A rejoinder to Hemming on Pell
Article
Article Title | Respect for juries: A rejoinder to Hemming on Pell |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 35399 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Patrick, Jeremy |
Journal Title | Alternative Law Journal |
Journal Citation | 48 (2), pp. 116-119 |
Number of Pages | 4 |
Year | 2023 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications Ltd |
Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
ISSN | 1037-969X |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org//10.1177/1037969X231159431 |
Web Address (URL) | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1037969X231159431 |
Abstract | The High Court decision in Pell v The Queen continues to be the subject of extensive academic controversy. In a pair of important articles, evidence and criminal law scholar Andrew Hemming has defended the Court’s decision. This rejoinder critiques Hemming’s defence (and, by extension, the High Court’s decision) on three grounds. First, because the decision conflates unchallenged testimony with honest and reliable testimony. Second, because it relies on ad hoc probabilistic determinations of discrete and unreplicable historical events. Third, because it fails to answer a key epistemological question: how could the High Court know more about what really did or did not happen in that sacristy than the jury? |
Keywords | reasonable doubt, jury verdicts, legal theory, jurisprudence, legal philosophy |
Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 480504. Legal institutions (incl. courts and justice systems) |
Byline Affiliations | School of Law and Justice |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/wq86v/respect-for-juries-a-rejoinder-to-hemming-on-pell
Download files
Published Version
patrick-2023-respect-for-juries-a-rejoinder-to-hemming-on-pell.pdf | ||
License: CC BY 4.0 | ||
File access level: Anyone |
78
total views36
total downloads6
views this month6
downloads this month