Using framework analysis to understand multiple stakeholders' views of vocational rehabilitation following acquired brain injury
Article
Johnston, Venerina, Brakenridge, Charlotte, Valiant, Donna, Leow, Charmaine Leow Kai, Andrews, Nicole, Gane, Elise M., Turner, Ben, Kendall, Melissa and Quinn, Ray. 2023. "Using framework analysis to understand multiple stakeholders' views of vocational rehabilitation following acquired brain injury." Brain Impairment. 24 (2), pp. 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2022.27
| Article Title | Using framework analysis to understand multiple stakeholders' views of vocational rehabilitation following acquired brain injury |
|---|---|
| ERA Journal ID | 15818 |
| Article Category | Article |
| Authors | Johnston, Venerina, Brakenridge, Charlotte, Valiant, Donna, Leow, Charmaine Leow Kai, Andrews, Nicole, Gane, Elise M., Turner, Ben, Kendall, Melissa and Quinn, Ray |
| Journal Title | Brain Impairment |
| Journal Citation | 24 (2), pp. 347-370 |
| Number of Pages | 24 |
| Year | 2023 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
| ISSN | 1443-9646 |
| 1839-5252 | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2022.27 |
| Web Address (URL) | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/brain-impairment/article/using-framework-analysis-to-understand-multiple-stakeholders-views-of-vocational-rehabilitation-following-acquired-brain-injury/BA0B4EAD8BE10C0C3C65996529372B98 |
| Abstract | Purpose: To explore how vocational rehabilitation (VR) is currently delivered for individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI) across multiple stakeholder groups and identify areas for improvement in service delivery using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Methods: Seven focus groups were conducted with rehabilitation clinicians; outreach providers, insurers/regulators, VR providers and disability employment service providers (n = 44) experienced in VR of individuals with ABI. All groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was guided by the CFIR constructs. Results: All stakeholder groups believed they offered quality VR interventions given available resources and legislation, but many clients fell through the 'cracks'. Themes that were identified included: a) number and complexity of systems supporting VR; b) fractured communication across systems, c) lack of knowledge by both stakeholders and clients in navigating systems, d) lack of expertise in supporting the vocational needs of clients with ABI and e) perceived limited awareness of ABI by employers. Conclusion: Stakeholders and clients need support to navigate Australia's complex VR pathways. Limited specialist ABI clinicians, VR providers and disability employment services were identified as barriers for effective VR. Domains of the CFIR were appropriate for organising and understanding how VR is delivered. © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment. |
| Keywords | Brain injury |
| ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 420305. Health and community services |
| 420109. Rehabilitation | |
| Byline Affiliations | School of Health and Medical Sciences |
| University of Queensland | |
| Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Australia | |
| Princess Alexandra Hospital, Australia | |
| Metro South Health, Queensland |
Permalink -
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/z260v/using-framework-analysis-to-understand-multiple-stakeholders-views-of-vocational-rehabilitation-following-acquired-brain-injury
Download files
Published Version
29
total views20
total downloads1
views this month4
downloads this month