Stigma, homosexuality and the homosexual advance defence
|ERA Journal ID
|Gray A. and Braun K.
|Journal of Law and Medicine
|24 (4), pp. 935-958
|Number of Pages
|Place of Publication
This article considers developments in the law regarding homosexuality through the prism of stigma, which retains an important role in psychology theory. It explores the role of law in perpetuating, or tackling, stigma. While the decriminalisation of homosexual practice between consenting adults has been important in reducing the stigma attached to homosexual activity, it is evident that stigma, and its associated serious psychological effects, persists in relation to sexuality. The recent High Court of Australia decision permitting a "homosexual advance defence" to be used by an offender accused of murdering the person making the unwanted advance is argued to reflect and perpetuate the continued stigmatisation of homosexual practice. There is reason to doubt whether the High Court would view an unwanted heterosexual advance in the same way as it apparently views an unwanted homosexual advance. The law must be careful in apparently excusing, or partly excusing, extremely violent (sometimes deadly) behaviour, and the message it sends when it does so.
|homosexual advance defence; stigma; provocation
|ANZSRC Field of Research 2020
|489999. Other law and legal studies not elsewhere classified
Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions.
|School of Law and Justice
|Institution of Origin
|University of Southern Queensland
|Stigma, homosexuality and the homosexual advance defence
0views this month
0downloads this month