Ranking Sub-Watersheds for Flood Hazard Mapping: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
Article
Nguyen, Nguyet-Minh, Bahramloo, Reza, Sadeghian, Jalal, Sepehri, Mehdi, Nazaripouya, Hadi, Dinh, Vuong Nguyen, Ghahramani, Afshin, Talebi, Ali, ElKhrachy, Ismail, Pande, Chaitanya B. and Meshram, Sarita Gajbhiye. 2023. "Ranking Sub-Watersheds for Flood Hazard Mapping: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach." Water. 15 (11). https://doi.org/10.3390/w15112128
Article Title | Ranking Sub-Watersheds for Flood Hazard Mapping: A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach |
---|---|
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Nguyen, Nguyet-Minh, Bahramloo, Reza, Sadeghian, Jalal, Sepehri, Mehdi, Nazaripouya, Hadi, Dinh, Vuong Nguyen, Ghahramani, Afshin, Talebi, Ali, ElKhrachy, Ismail, Pande, Chaitanya B. and Meshram, Sarita Gajbhiye |
Journal Title | Water |
Journal Citation | 15 (11) |
Article Number | 2128 |
Number of Pages | 19 |
Year | 2023 |
Publisher | MDPI AG |
Place of Publication | Switzerland |
ISSN | 2073-4441 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.3390/w15112128 |
Web Address (URL) | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/11/2128 |
Abstract | The aim of this paper is to assess the extent to which the Sad-Kalan watershed in Iran participates in floods and rank the Sad-Kalan sub-watersheds in terms of flooding potential by utilizing multi-criteria decision-making approaches. We employed the entropy of a drainage network, stream power index (SPI), slope, topographic control index (TCI), and compactness coefficient (Cc) in this investigation. After forming a decision matrix with 25 possibilities (sub-watersheds) and 5 evaluation indices, we used four MCDM approaches, including the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), best–worst method (BWM), interval rough numbers AHP (IRNAHP), picture fuzzy with AHP (PF-AHP), and picture fuzzy with linear assignment model (PF-LAM, hereafter PICALAM) algorithms, to rank the sub-watersheds. The study results demonstrated that PICALAM exhibited superior performance compared to the other methods due to its consideration of both local and global weights for each criterion. Additionally, among the methods used (AHP, BWM, and IRNAHP) that showed similar performances in ranking the sub-watersheds, the BWM method proved to be more time-efficient in the ranking process. |
Keywords | flooding; Sad-Kalan watershed; AHP; BWM; IRNAHP; PICALAM |
Byline Affiliations | Van Lang University, Viet Nam |
Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran | |
Bu-Ali Sina University, Iran | |
Yazd University, Iran | |
Southern Institute of Water Resources Research, Vietnam | |
Institute for Life Sciences and the Environment | |
Najran University, Saudi Arabia | |
Al-Ayen University, Iraq | |
Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, India | |
Water Resources and Applied Mathematics Research Lab, India |
Permalink -
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/z267v/ranking-sub-watersheds-for-flood-hazard-mapping-a-multi-criteria-decision-making-approach
Download files
57
total views38
total downloads7
views this month4
downloads this month