Queensland Legislators and a Right to Property as a Human Right: The Functioning of the Concept of Human Dignity

Queensland Legislators and a Right to Property as a Human Right: The Functioning of the Concept of Human Dignity

The work of Queensland’s legislators when evaluating property questions ought to be taken seriously. Issues of property raise important legal and political considerations for legislators who must enact legislation mediating individual rights and interests and collective considerations. New complexity and difficulty are brought by provisions in the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) requiring legislators to promote and protect ‘property rights’ (section 24) and to limit property rights only if a limit can be shown to be justified in a ‘free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom’ (section 13).
From legal and social (including political) theory and High Court jurisprudence the thesis provides Queensland legislators with a set of real-world normative tools to address contemporary and future complexity and difficulty. The theory includes JW Harris’s theory of property and justice, Jeremy Waldron’s democratic jurisprudence, Jürgen Habermas’s approach to human dignity and human rights, and the unified public law theory of Jacob Weinrib. The tools developed from theory equip legislators to evaluate property questions by way of rational discourse about the underlying human values property serves and the social relationships property shapes and reflects. When legislators mediate the interests of the diversity of people in the political community, the tools equip politicians to ensure a legislative response conforms with common law and statutory controls on legislative authority.

Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions.