Reporting on service performance: measurement and myth in the New Zealand compulsory education sector
Paper
Paper/Presentation Title | Reporting on service performance: measurement and myth in the New Zealand compulsory education sector |
---|---|
Presentation Type | Paper |
Authors | |
Author | Beattie, Claire |
Editors | Gupta, Atul |
Journal or Proceedings Title | 7th Global Conference on Business & Economics - Proceedings |
Number of Pages | 22 |
Year | 2007 |
Place of Publication | Rome, Italy |
Web Address (URL) of Paper | http://www.facultyforum.com/gcbe/ |
Conference/Event | 7th Global Conference on Business & Economics |
Event Details | 7th Global Conference on Business & Economics Event Date 13 to end of 14 Oct 2007 Event Location Rome, Italy |
Abstract | [Abstract]: This paper reports on the results of a case study investigating the response of New Zealand schools to the legislative requirement to prepare service performance reports. To date, the ongoing failure to successfully establish service performance reporting in schools suggests further research is warranted. Prime facie, it was expected that schools would find the output and outcome distinction underlying the Ministry of Education’s procedural guidelines difficult to apply. However, the case study findings support this expectation to a surprising extent. Schools do not apply the output/outcome distinction to their choice of objectives because they include only activities that are easy to measure in their statements of service performance. Objectives are then designed to fit these activities. In this sense, schools adopt a historical and arbitrary methodology to service performance reporting whilst government policy assumes a forward looking and purposeful approach. The research findings also suggest that schools do not prepare statements of service performance in the way intended by the reporting framework because they question its applicability and relevance. Participants expressed concerns with the language used in service performance reporting because it is informed by terminology which they perceive to be associated with commercial enterprises. Schools felt this model was incongruous with the educational environment. Overall, the research suggests that schools are not prepared to devote sufficient time and resources to developing adequate reports of service performance. If, as appears to be case, “service performance reports are [expected to be] forged in the field, by the public entities required to produce them” (Thompson, 1995, p.337) then service performance reporting in the school sector seems destined to remain a controversial and problematic issue for both the schools and the New Zealand government. |
Keywords | New Zealand, schools, service performance reports, service performance reporting |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 390403. Educational administration, management and leadership |
350102. Auditing and accountability | |
390402. Education assessment and evaluation | |
Public Notes | No evidence of copyright restrictions on web site. |
Byline Affiliations | School of Accounting, Economics and Finance |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/9y8q0/reporting-on-service-performance-measurement-and-myth-in-the-new-zealand-compulsory-education-sector
Download files
2025
total views414
total downloads0
views this month1
downloads this month