Complexes tickling the $ubject
Article
Article Title | Complexes tickling the $ubject |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 210563 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | |
Author | Gildersleeve, Matthew |
Journal Title | Humanities |
Journal Citation | 5 (4), pp. 1-27 |
Article Number | 85 |
Number of Pages | 27 |
Year | 2016 |
Place of Publication | Basel, Switzerland |
ISSN | 2076-0787 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.3390/h5040085 |
Web Address (URL) | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/5/4/85 |
Abstract | This article continues my earlier work of reading Jung with Lacan. This article will develop Zizek’s work on Lacan’s concept of objet petit a by relating it to a phenomenological interpretation of Jung. I use a number of different examples, including Zizek’s interpretation of Francis Bacon, Edvard Munch, Hans Holbein and Johann Gottlieb Fichte, to describe the objet petit a and its relationship to a phenomenological interpretation of complexes. By integrating other Lacanian concepts, such as subject, drive, fantasy, jouissance, gaze, desire, and ego as well as the imaginary, symbolic and Real, this work also highlights how Hegel and Heidegger can elucidate the relationship between objet petit a and complexes. Jung’s transcendent function and the Rosarium Philosophorum also elucidate the relationship between Jung and Lacan. |
Keywords | Jung; Lacan; Zizek; Heidegger; Nietzsche; Hegel |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 360102. Art history |
500320. Psychoanalytic philosophy | |
500309. Metaphysics | |
Byline Affiliations | University of Queensland |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q4y25/complexes-tickling-the-ubject
Download files
212
total views88
total downloads4
views this month1
downloads this month