Who’s a Good Handler? Important Skills and Personality Profiles of Wildlife Detection Dog Handlers
Article
Article Title | Who’s a Good Handler? Important Skills and Personality Profiles of Wildlife Detection Dog Handlers |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 200143 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Jamieson, La Toya J. (Author), Baxter, Greg S. (Author) and Murray, Peter J. (Author) |
Journal Title | Animals |
Journal Citation | 8 (12), pp. 1-14 |
Article Number | 222 |
Number of Pages | 14 |
Year | 2018 |
Publisher | MDPI AG |
Place of Publication | Switzerland |
ISSN | 2076-2615 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8120222 |
Web Address (URL) | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/8/12/222 |
Abstract | Wildlife detection dog teams are employed internationally for environmental surveys, and their success often depends on the dog handler. Minimal research is available on the skills that dog handlers believe are important, and no research has been published on the personality profiles of wildlife detection dog handlers. This may reveal the skills that people should acquire to be successful at, or suitable for, this work. An online questionnaire was distributed to Australian and New Zealand wildlife detection dog handlers. This questionnaire provided a list of skills to be rated based on importance, and a personality assessment measured their five main personality domains (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness). A total of 35 questionnaires were collected, which represented over half of the estimated Australian wildlife detection dog handler population. The handlers had on average 7.2 years of dog handling experience, and 54% were female. More than half (57%) of the handlers stated that they were very emotionally attached to their dogs; however, 9% stated they were either not attached or mildly attached to their working dogs. The skill that was rated highest for importance was ‘ability to read dog body language’, and the lowest was ‘skilled in report writing’. On average, the handlers scored high in the Agreeableness domain, low in the Neuroticism domain, and average in the Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Openness domains. However, all of the personality scores had large ranges. Therefore, a dog handler’s personality may not be as influential on their success as their training or their dog–handler bond. Further research would be beneficial regarding the direct impact that the dog–handler bond and the handler’s knowledge have on working team outcomes. |
Keywords | dog handler; detection dog; personality; skills; dog–handler relationship |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 449999. Other human society not elsewhere classified |
310901. Animal behaviour | |
Byline Affiliations | University of Queensland |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q6362/who-s-a-good-handler-important-skills-and-personality-profiles-of-wildlife-detection-dog-handlers
Download files
119
total views61
total downloads4
views this month1
downloads this month