Diabetes improvement and resolution following laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Article
Article Title | Diabetes improvement and resolution following laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 16883 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Osland, Emma (Author), Yunus, Rossita Mohamad (Author), Khan, Shahjahan (Author), Memon, Breda (Author) and Memon, Muhammed Ashraf (Author) |
Journal Title | Surgical Endoscopy: surgical and interventional techniques |
Journal Citation | 31 (4), pp. 1952-1963 |
Number of Pages | 12 |
Year | 2017 |
Publisher | Springer |
Place of Publication | United States |
ISSN | 0930-2794 |
1432-2218 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5202-5 |
Web Address (URL) | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-016-5202-5 |
Abstract | The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is growing in both developed and developing countries and is strongly linked with the prevalence of obesity. Bariatric surgical procedures such as laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass LRYGB) are increasingly being utilized to manage related comorbid chronic conditions, including type 2 diabetes. Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was undertaken using the PRISMA guidelines to investigate the postoperative impact on diabetes resolution following LVSG versus LRYGB. Results: Seven RCTs involving a total of 732 patients (LVSG n = 365, LRYGB n = 367) met inclusion criteria. Significant diabetes resolution or improvement was reported with both procedures across all time points. Similarly, measures of glycemic control (HbA1C and fasting blood glucose levels) improved with both procedures, with earlier improvements noted in LRYGB that stabilized and did not differ from LVSG at 12 months postoperatively. Early improvements in measures of insulin resistance in both procedures were also noted in the studies that investigated this. Conclusions: This systematic review of RCTs suggests that both LVSG and LRYGB are effective in resolving or improving preoperative type 2 diabetes in obese patients during the reported 3- to 5-year follow-up periods. However, further studies are required before longer-term outcomes can be elucidated. Areas identified that need to be addressed for future studies on this topic include longer follow-up periods, standardized definitions and time point for reporting, and financial analysis of outcomes obtained between surgical procedures to better inform procedure selection. |
Keywords | bariatric surgery; laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; diabetes; systematic review |
Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 429999. Other health sciences not elsewhere classified |
490501. Applied statistics | |
490502. Biostatistics | |
Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
Byline Affiliations | Department of Health, Queensland |
University of Malaya, Malaysia | |
School of Agricultural, Computational and Environmental Sciences | |
Sunnybank Obesity Centre, Australia |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q3w80/diabetes-improvement-and-resolution-following-laparoscopic-vertical-sleeve-gastrectomy-lvsg-versus-laparoscopic-roux-en-y-gastric-bypass-lrygb-procedures-a-systematic-review-of-randomized-controlled
1529
total views10
total downloads4
views this month0
downloads this month