Carbon offsetting by Queensland councils: motives and benefits
Paper
Paper/Presentation Title | Carbon offsetting by Queensland councils: motives and benefits |
---|---|
Presentation Type | Paper |
Authors | |
Author | Zeppel, Heather |
Editors | Pillora, Stefanie |
Journal or Proceedings Title | Proceedings of the 3rd National Local Government Researchers' Forum (ACELG 2013) |
ERA Conference ID | 51006 |
Number of Pages | 17 |
Year | 2013 |
Place of Publication | Sydney, Australia |
Web Address (URL) of Paper | http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/conferences/index.php/acelg/PNLGRF/schedConf/presentations |
Conference/Event | 3rd National Local Government Researchers' Forum (ACELG 2013) |
National Local Government Researchers' Forum | |
Event Details | 3rd National Local Government Researchers' Forum (ACELG 2013) Event Date 06 to end of 07 Jun 2013 Event Location Adelaide, Australia |
Event Details | National Local Government Researchers' Forum NLGRF |
Abstract | Carbon offsetting provides one avenue for local councils to mitigate their greenhouse gas emissions. This includes voluntary offsetting of council events or activities and purchasing carbon credits to offset emissions from transport, or landfill sites exceeding 25,000tCO2-e. Offsets are 'An investment in a project that reduces greenhouse gas emissions or sequesters carbon from the atmosphere' to compensate for emissions from other activities (LGAQ, 2009: 58). Under the Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Act 2011, local councils can also earn carbon credits through managing landfill emissions, or environmental plantings. This paper evaluates carbon offsetting actions and motives by Queensland councils from a 2012 quantitative and qualitative survey sent to all 73 councils. Some 32 councils completed the survey with a response rate of 51% (excluding Aboriginal shires). Seventeen Queensland councils stated offsetting was not necessary nor a priority, due to their small size, or were unsure about offset guidelines. However, five city councils and two coastal regional councils were partially offsetting emissions mainly from vehicle fuel and electricity, or community events. Councils with a climate change strategy, aiming to be carbon neutral (i.e. Cairns, Gold Coast, Redland, Sunshine Coast), were most likely to offset. The preferred offset action by councils was tree planting on council land or in partnership with conservation groups or offset companies (Ecofund Queensland, Greening Australia, & Greenfleet). Four councils wanted to sell/earn carbon credits, or support local landholders. The key motives for carbon offsetting included: council concern about climate impacts; supporting conservation; being climate friendly; and financially supporting offset projects. Councils preferred carbon offset methods such as tree planting or renewable energy with tangible environmental and financial benefits. |
Keywords | climate change mitigation; carbon offsetting; local government; Queensland |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 440699. Human geography not elsewhere classified |
440704. Environment policy | |
410404. Environmental management | |
Public Notes | This publication is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part for the purposes of study, research, or review, but is subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Open access journal. |
Byline Affiliations | Centre for Sustainable Business and Development |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q2251/carbon-offsetting-by-queensland-councils-motives-and-benefits
Download files
1997
total views312
total downloads5
views this month2
downloads this month