The concept of objectivity in the UK Supreme Court through a comparative looking glass

Edited book (chapter)


Breda, Vito. 2016. "The concept of objectivity in the UK Supreme Court through a comparative looking glass." Breda, Vito and Rodack, Lidia (ed.) Diverse narratives of legal objectivity: an interdisciplinary perspective. England. Peter Lang Publishing. pp. 211-224
Chapter Title

The concept of objectivity in the UK Supreme Court through a comparative looking glass

Book Chapter CategoryEdited book (chapter)
ERA Publisher ID2934
Book TitleDiverse narratives of legal objectivity: an interdisciplinary perspective
Authors
AuthorBreda, Vito
EditorsBreda, Vito and Rodack, Lidia
Volume19
Page Range211-224
SeriesDia-Logos. Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences
Chapter Number10
Number of Pages13
Year2016
PublisherPeter Lang Publishing
Place of PublicationEngland
ISBN9783631653432
9783653045338
Web Address (URL)https://www.peterlang.com/document/1048602
Abstract

During a public lecture on astronomy, the speaker is interrupted by an old lady sitting at the back of the room: 'What you told us is nonsense! The world is flat and it is supported by a giant turtle. The lecturer quickly responded: 'What is the turtle standing on?'. To which the lady rebutted: 'You are a very clever young man, but it’s turtle all the way down!' The lecturer, who according to Hawking might be Bertrand Russell, had allowed the opportunity for the assumptions of the given argument to be questioned (that the world is flat and that it is held up by a giant turtle). Yet, he chose, showing perhaps a glimpse of arrogance, to question the internal logic of the old lady’s argument. The decision was indeed unwise and his attempt to discredit the ‘turtle argument’ was quickly repelled.

The anecdote is a powerful reminder to all public speakers of the dangers of belittling an audience, but that is a trivial point. The message that Hawking wants to deliver in the opening lines of his book is twofold. Firstly, 'I will not make the same mistake'. A Brief History of Time will be focused squarely on a representation of reality that can be, within the margins of error of any scientific analysis, objectively verified. Secondly and perhaps as a corollary of the first point, the book will not be about the interpretation of the semantic structure of a theory.

The anecdote, I think, is also quite useful in understanding the difficulty of developing an objective legal reasoning in common law systems. In common law, judges often have to marry factual analysis with an interpretative activity of legal norms, which might be extracted from a common understanding of a narrative. For instance, murder is defined in England and Wales by the judicial interpretation of a section of a seventeenth-century textbook (Edward Coke’s Institutes of the Laws of England). The facts of the murder might include a historical narrative of events such as Mrs Smith was killed by a bullet which might be objectively tested. It is up to the parties to show that a factual narrative might be engaged by the facts of the case. In the case of our example, the death of Mrs Smith will require an interpretation of Coke’s book. The process is elegantly described by MacCormick:
'In these situations, the private complainer or public rule ¬enforcer must bring forward some assertions about the state of facts in the world, and attempt to show how that state of facts would call for intervention on the ground of some rule that applies to the asserted facts. Accordingly, the logic of rule-application is the central logic of the law within the modern paradigm of legal rationality under the 'rule of law'.'

The debate over the rule of law will not be part of our discussion. My argument here is, instead, that a judge, by way of comparison to a scientist such as Hawking, cannot avoid evaluating objectively ‘hard’ evidence that describes reality and, at the same time, s/he has to assess the plausibility of the ‘soft’ legal arguments that describe the semantic interpretation of the text.

Even if the normative aspect of the idea of objectivity is normally excluded from the court’s daily activity, it seems that judges are asked to do what would appear to be two dissimilar activities: the evaluation of the scientific explanation of reality and the assessment of the parties’ legal argument. Both activities demand, respectively, an evaluation of arguments based on pre-set criteria.

Let me develop this point. On a general level, the criteria of evaluation of factual and legal narratives might be different, since they are retrieved from different branches of science. For instance, the laws of physics might help with the ballistic trajectory of a bullet and philological assumptions might explain the significance of the term ‘murder’ in Coke’s book. However, in both instances, the judge makes an assessment based on criteria set by a community of experts. In describing the similarities between hard and soft sciences, Rorty, I think, delivers this point in clear narrative: 'They [hard and soft representation of reality] offer an account of enquiry which recognizes socio-logical, but not epistemological, differences between such disciplinary matrices as theoretical physics and literary criticism'. In short, having a shared idea of what is an objective analysis is an axiomatic aspect of any scientific endeavour. For instance, a basic mathematic formula (e.g. 1 + 1 = 2) requires abstracting, synthesis as well as an agreement in principle on what numbers mean. Developing his argument, Rorty suggests that objectivity cannot be constructed in universal terms (neither in pure science, nor in the humanities) and the sooner we accept such a limitation, the more fruitful our understanding of the idea of objectivity will be. Coleman and Leiter suggest a similar conclusion, albeit starting from different assumptions, in their concept of modest objectivity in law.

The point I would like to make here is that judges can, and following Rorty, must adopt different criteria of objectivity in relation to the subject of their analysis. In other words, an examination of the use of the concept of objectivity in the UK legal discourse should retrieve a cluster of criteria for both a scientific and interpretative perception of objectivity. An analysis of 98 cases did indeed confirm Rorty's analysis, and both the factual and interpretative ideas of objectivity. However, a second group of significances for the term objectivity (which is linked to a semantic interpretation of text) is, by way of comparison with the interpretation that associated it with factual narrative, far less common.

Keywordslaw; judicial objectivity; comparative law
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020480605. Tort law
480702. Constitutional law
480502. Civil procedure
480302. Comparative law
480701. Administrative law
500202. History and philosophy of law and justice
Public Notes

Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions.

Byline AffiliationsSchool of Law and Justice
Silesian University, Poland
Institution of OriginUniversity of Southern Queensland
Permalink -

https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q342y/the-concept-of-objectivity-in-the-uk-supreme-court-through-a-comparative-looking-glass

  • 1762
    total views
  • 33
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Narcissism of small/minor differences
Breda, Vito. 2026. "Narcissism of small/minor differences ." Sardoc, Mitja (ed.) Encyclopedia of Diversity. Switzerland. Springer. pp. 1-9
Patriotism
Breda, Vito. 2024. "Patriotism." Sardoc, Mitja (ed.) Encyclopedia of Diversity. Switzerland. Springer. pp. 1-9
Samoa
Breda, Vito. 2024. "Samoa." Albert, R. and Depieri, M. (ed.) 2023 International Review of Constitutional Reform. United States. University of Texas Press. pp. 321-325
Constitutional Crises and Regionalism: Elgar Monographs in Constitutional and Administrative Law
Breda, Vito. 2023. Constitutional Crises and Regionalism: Elgar Monographs in Constitutional and Administrative Law . United Kingdom. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Shari’a Law in Catholic Italy: A Non-agnostic Model of Accommodation
Breda, Vito. 2023. "Shari’a Law in Catholic Italy: A Non-agnostic Model of Accommodation." Possamai, Aam, Richardson, James T. and Turner, Bryan S. (ed.) The Sociology of Shari’a: Case Studies from Around the World . Switzerland. Springer. pp. 201–219
Regionalism
Breda, Vito. 2023. "Regionalism." Smits, Jan M., Husa, Jaakko, Valcke, Catherine and Narciso, Madalena (ed.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law . United Kingdom. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 297-304
The gay cake controversy in the United Kingdom and Italian inertia
Breda, Vito and Frau, Matteo. 2022. "The gay cake controversy in the United Kingdom and Italian inertia ." Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 29 (6), pp. 708-725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231158488
Balancing Competing Dignity Claims: Insights from the United Kingdom and Italy
Frau, Matteo and Breda, Vito. 2021. "Balancing Competing Dignity Claims: Insights from the United Kingdom and Italy." Bussey, Barry W. and Menuge, Angus J. L. (ed.) The Inherence of Human Dignity: Law and Religious Liberty, Volume 2. London, United Kingdom. Anthem Press. pp. 165-184
The Governor General in Australia and gender equality
Gleeson, Kate and Breda, Vito. 2020. "The Governor General in Australia and gender equality." Royal Studies Journal. 7 (2), pp. 10-30.
Northern Ireland and South Tyrol: constitutional boundaries in consociational democracies
Breda, Vito and Wolfe O'Rourke, Erin. 2020. "Northern Ireland and South Tyrol: constitutional boundaries in consociational democracies." Breda, Vito and Frau, Matteo (ed.) La contrattazione costituzionale dei livelli di autonomia: modelli per una comparazione. Italy. Editoriale Scientifica. pp. 25-52
Preface [to La contrattazione costituzionale dei livelli di autonomia: modelli per una comparazione]
Breda, Vito and Frau, Matteo. 2020. "Preface [to La contrattazione costituzionale dei livelli di autonomia: modelli per una comparazione]." Breda, Vito and Frau, Matteo (ed.) La contrattazione costituzionale dei livelli di autonomia: modelli per una comparazione. Naples, Italy. Editoriale Scientifica. pp. 7-9
La contrattazione costituzionale dei livelli di autonomia: modelli per una comparazione
Breda, Vito and Frau, Matteo. 2020. La contrattazione costituzionale dei livelli di autonomia: modelli per una comparazione. Naples, italy. Editoriale Scientifica.
Concluding remarks [to La contrattazione costituzionale dei livelli di autonomia: modelli per una comparazione]
Breda, Vito. 2020. "Concluding remarks [to La contrattazione costituzionale dei livelli di autonomia: modelli per una comparazione]." Breda, Vito and Frau, Matteo (ed.) La contrattazione costituzionale dei livelli di autonomia: modelli per una comparazione. Naples, Italy. Editoriale Scientifica. pp. 205-208
Conclusion
Breda, Vito. 2019. "Conclusion." Breda, Vito (ed.) Legal transplants in East Asia and Oceania. United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press. pp. 321-324
Introduction
Breda, Vito. 2019. "Introduction." Breda, Vito (ed.) Legal transplants in East Asia and Oceania. United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-15
Constitutional patriotism
Breda, Vito. 2020. "Constitutional patriotism." Sardoc, Mitja (ed.) Handbook of patriotism. Cham, Switzerland. Springer. pp. 179-192
New Caledonia: the archipelago that does not want to be freed
Breda, Vito and Mihailovic, Andreja. 2019. "New Caledonia: the archipelago that does not want to be freed." Comparative Law Journal of the Pacific. XXIV (Tier II), pp. 69-95.
Advanced introduction to law and globalisation by Jaakko Husa
Breda, Vito. 2019. "Advanced introduction to law and globalisation by Jaakko Husa." The Modern Law Review. 82 (4), pp. 755-758. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12430
Samoa: constitutional governance and customary law
Breda, Vito. 2019. "Samoa: constitutional governance and customary law." Revue juridique polyne´sienne. 23, pp. 163-180.
Constitutional law and regionalism: a comparative analysis of regionalist negotiations
Breda, Vito. 2018. Constitutional law and regionalism: a comparative analysis of regionalist negotiations. United Kingdom. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Over the secular ridge of human wants: the constitutional legitimacy of secular-state funding of chaplaincy programmes in Australia
Breda, Vito. 2018. "Over the secular ridge of human wants: the constitutional legitimacy of secular-state funding of chaplaincy programmes in Australia." Menuge, Angus J. L. (ed.) Religious liberty and the law: theistic and non-theistic perspectives. United Kingdomn. Routledge. pp. 159-174
Constitutional patriotism
Breda, Vito. 2017. "Constitutional patriotism." Sellers, Mortimer and Kirste, Stephan (ed.) Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Netherlands. Springer. pp. 1-7
The grammar of bias: judicial impartiality in European legal systems
Breda, Vito. 2017. "The grammar of bias: judicial impartiality in European legal systems." International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 30 (2), pp. 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-016-9489-2
Interlocking constitutions: towards an interordinal theory of national, European and UN law by Louis I. Gordillo
Breda, Vito. 2014. "Interlocking constitutions: towards an interordinal theory of national, European and UN law by Louis I. Gordillo ." The Modern Law Review. 77 (5), pp. 827-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12084_3
Constitutional Futures Revisited: Britain's Constitution to 2020 by Robert Hazell
Breda, Vito. 2011. "Constitutional Futures Revisited: Britain's Constitution to 2020 by Robert Hazell." Public Law: the constitutional and administrative law of the commonwealth.
Shari’a law in Catholic Italy: a non-agnostic model of accommodation
Breda, Vito. 2015. "Shari’a law in Catholic Italy: a non-agnostic model of accommodation." Possamai, Adam, Richardson, James T. and Turner, Bryan S. (ed.) The sociology of Shari’a: case studies from around the world. United States. Springer. pp. 119-137
The objectivity of judicial decisions: a comparative analysis of nine jurisdictions
Breda, Vito. 2017. The objectivity of judicial decisions: a comparative analysis of nine jurisdictions. New York, United States. Peter Lang Publishing.
An odd partnership: identity-based constitutional claims in modern democracy
Breda, Vito. 2014. "An odd partnership: identity-based constitutional claims in modern democracy." Jenkins, Fiona, Nolan, Mark and Rubenstein, Kim (ed.) Allegiance and identity in a globalised world. Cambridge, United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press. pp. 52-76
[Introduction] to Diverse narratives of legal objectivity
Breda, Vito and Rodack, Lidia. 2016. "[Introduction] to Diverse narratives of legal objectivity." Breda, Vito and Rodack, Lidia (ed.) Diverse narratives of legal objectivity: an interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford, England. Peter Lang Publishing. pp. 7-12
Indigenous Australians and the constitutional reform: learning from a very British experience
Breda, Vito. 2016. "Indigenous Australians and the constitutional reform: learning from a very British experience." Young, Simon, Nielsen, Jennifer and Patrick, Jeremy (ed.) Constitutional recognition of first peoples in Australia: theories and comparative perspectives. Sydney, Australia. Federation Press. pp. 229-246
The Australian offshore detention regime: a constitutional reflection
Breda, Vito. 2016. "The Australian offshore detention regime: a constitutional reflection." Quaderni Costituzionali. 36 (4), pp. 813-816. https://doi.org/10.1439/85062
Constitutional patriotism and the Scottish referendum
Breda, Vito. 2015. "Constitutional patriotism and the Scottish referendum." Hulas, Maciej and Fel, Stanislaw (ed.) Intricacies of Patriotism: towards a complexity of patriotic allegiance. United Kingdom. Peter Lang Publishing. pp. 161-185
Lingering with intent: the UK constitutional review
Breda, Vito. 2015. "Lingering with intent: the UK constitutional review." Jovanovich, Miodrag A. (ed.) Constitutional Review and Democracy. Netherlands. Eleven International Publishing. pp. 165-184
English pragmatism and Italian virtue: a comparative analysis of the regime of illegally obtained evidence in civil law proceedings between Italy and England
Breda, Vito and Vricella, Matteo. 2014. "English pragmatism and Italian virtue: a comparative analysis of the regime of illegally obtained evidence in civil law proceedings between Italy and England." Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 21 (3), pp. 435-450.
Review of social attitudes in Northern Ireland: the ninth report
Breda, Vito. 2005. "Review of social attitudes in Northern Ireland: the ninth report." SCOLAG.
Constitutional identities in a liquid society
Breda, Vito. 2007. "Constitutional identities in a liquid society." Priban, Gigi (ed.) Liquid society and its law. Abingdon, Oxon. United Kingdom. Ashgate Publishing Limited. pp. 153-169
A European constitution in a multinational Europe or a multinational constitution for Europe?
Breda, Vito. 2006. "A European constitution in a multinational Europe or a multinational constitution for Europe?" European Law Journal. 12 (3), pp. 330-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00320.x
The incoherence of the patriotic state: a critique of 'constitutional patriotism'
Breda, Vito. 2004. "The incoherence of the patriotic state: a critique of 'constitutional patriotism'." Res Publica. 10, pp. 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-004-0828-x
The odd case of the legal foundation module: reporting on student perceptions of e-learning at Cardiff Law School
Breda, V. and Langton, N.. 2011. "The odd case of the legal foundation module: reporting on student perceptions of e-learning at Cardiff Law School." Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education. 8 (1), pp. 59-84.
How to reverse the Italian brain drain: a master class from Australia
Breda, Vito. 2014. "How to reverse the Italian brain drain: a master class from Australia." International Migration. 52 (4), pp. 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12142
Balancing secularism with religious freedom: in Lautsi v. Italy, the European Court of Human Rights evolved
Breda, Vito. 2013. "Balancing secularism with religious freedom: in Lautsi v. Italy, the European Court of Human Rights evolved." Menuge, Angus (ed.) Legitimizing human rights: secular and religious perspectives. United Kingdom. Ashgate Publishing Limited. pp. 127-142
The Scottish devolution and the 2014 referendum: what are the potential reverberations in Spain?
Breda, Vito. 2013. "The Scottish devolution and the 2014 referendum: what are the potential reverberations in Spain?" Teoria y Realidad Constitucional. 31 (1), pp. 69-88.
Jurisprudence of National Identity by Nan Seuffert
Breda, Vito. 2009. "Jurisprudence of National Identity by Nan Seuffert." Social and Legal Studies: an international journal. 18 (4), pp. 467-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639090180040703
Constitutional Dilemmas: Conflicts of Fundamental Legal Rights in Europe and the USA by Lorenzo Zucca
Breda, Vito. 2009. "Constitutional Dilemmas: Conflicts of Fundamental Legal Rights in Europe and the USA by Lorenzo Zucca ." The Modern Law Review. 72 (2), pp. 325-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00746_4.x
Public Law and Politics by Emilios Christodoulidis and Stephen Tierney (eds)
Breda, Vito. 2009. "Public Law and Politics by Emilios Christodoulidis and Stephen Tierney (eds)." The Modern Law Review. 72 (6), pp. 1055-1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00780_4.x
La Delittuosità Degli Immigrati nel Comune di Milano (1991-1996): È Vero Aumento?
Breda, Vito. 1998. "La Delittuosità Degli Immigrati nel Comune di Milano (1991-1996): È Vero Aumento?" Italian Journal of Criminology. 9 (3/4), p. 517–528.