CrossFit overview: systematic review and meta-analysis
Article
Article Title | CrossFit overview: systematic review and meta-analysis |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 211380 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Claudino, Joao Gustavo (Author), Gabbett, Tim J. (Author), Bourgeois, Frank (Author), de Sa Souza, Helton (Author), Miranda, Rafael Chagas (Author), Mezencio, Bruno (Author), Soncin, Rafael (Author), Cardoso Filho, Carlos Alberto (Author), Bottaro, Martim (Author), Hernandez, Arnoldo Jose (Author), Amadio, Alberto Carlos (Author) and Serrao, Julio Cerca (Author) |
Journal Title | Sports Medicine - Open |
Journal Citation | 4 (1), pp. 1-14 |
Number of Pages | 14 |
Year | 2018 |
Place of Publication | Germany |
ISSN | 2198-9761 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5 |
Web Address (URL) | https://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5 |
Abstract | BACKGROUND: CrossFit is recognized as one of the fastest growing high-intensity functional training modes in the world. However, scientific data regarding the practice of CrossFit is sparse. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the findings of scientific literature related to CrossFit via systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Systematic searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Bireme/MedLine, and SciELO online databases were conducted for articles reporting the effects of CrossFit training. The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. The Oxford Levels of Evidence was used for all included articles, and only studies that investigated the effects of CrossFit as a training program were included in the meta-analysis. For the meta-analysis, effect sizes (ESs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Thirty-one articles were included in the systematic review and four were included in the meta-analysis. However, only two studies had a high level of evidence at low risk of bias. Scientific literature related to CrossFit has reported on body composition, psycho-physiological parameters, musculoskeletal injury risk, life and health aspects, and psycho-social behavior. In the meta-analysis, significant results were not found for any variables. CONCLUSIONS: The current scientific literature related to CrossFit has few studies with high level of evidence at low risk of bias. However, preliminary data has suggested that CrossFit practice is associated with higher levels of sense of community, satisfaction, and motivation. |
Keywords | high-intensity functional training, high-intensity interval training, training load |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 420799. Sports science and exercise not elsewhere classified |
Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
Byline Affiliations | Sao Paulo State University, Brazil |
Institute for Resilient Regions | |
Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand | |
Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil | |
University of Brasilia, Brazil | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q53vw/crossfit-overview-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis
239
total views10
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month