Understanding occupational sitting: prevalence, correlates and moderating effects in Australian employees
Article
| Article Title | Understanding occupational sitting: prevalence, correlates and moderating effects in Australian employees |
|---|---|
| ERA Journal ID | 13754 |
| Article Category | Article |
| Authors | De Cocker, Katrien (Author), Duncan, Mitch J. (Author), Short, Camille (Author), van Uffelen, Jannique G. Z. (Author) and Vandelanotte, Corneel (Author) |
| Journal Title | Preventive Medicine |
| Journal Citation | 67, pp. 288-94 |
| Year | 2014 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Place of Publication | Nertherlands |
| ISSN | 0091-7435 |
| 1096-0260 | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.031 |
| Web Address (URL) | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743514002722?via%3Dihub |
| Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To (1) compare occupational sitting between different socio-demographic, health-related, work-related and psychosocial categories, (2) identity socio-demographic, health-related, work-related and psychosocial correlates of occupational sitting, and (3) examine the moderating effect of work-related factors in the relation between correlates and occupational sitting. METHODS: Randomly-selected Australian adults completed a web-based survey assessing socio-demographic (country of birth, gender, age, education, income), health-related (general health, weight, physical activity), work-related (employment status, occupational task, occupational classification) and sedentary-specific psychosocial (social norm, social support, self-efficacy, control, advantages, disadvantage, intention) factors, and occupational sitting-time. t-tests, ANOVAs and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted (in 2013) on a sample of employees (n=993). RESULTS: Respondents sat on average for 3.75 (SD=2.45) h/day during work. Investigated correlates explained 41% of the variance in occupational sitting. More occupational sitting was associated with being male, being younger, higher education and income, part-time and full-time employment, sedentary job tasks, white-collar/professional occupations, higher BMI, and perceiving more advantages of sitting less at work. Employment status and occupational classification moderated the association between control to sit less and occupational sitting. A lack of control to sit less was associated with higher occupational sitting in part-time and full-time workers, but not in casual workers; and in white-collar and professional workers, but not in blue-collar workers. CONCLUSIONS: Most important contributors to occupational sitting were work-related and socio-demographic correlates. More research is needed to confirm present results. |
| Keywords | sedentary behaviour, cross-sectional study, workplace, online survey |
| ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 429999. Other health sciences not elsewhere classified |
| 420799. Sports science and exercise not elsewhere classified | |
| Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
| Byline Affiliations | Ghent University, Belgium |
| University of Newcastle | |
| Central Queensland University | |
| Victoria University | |
| Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q5615/understanding-occupational-sitting-prevalence-correlates-and-moderating-effects-in-australian-employees
226
total views7
total downloads4
views this month0
downloads this month