Assessment of muscle-strengthening exercise in public health surveillance for adults: a systematic review
Article
Article Title | Assessment of muscle-strengthening exercise in public health surveillance for adults: a systematic review |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 13754 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Shakespear-Druery, Jane (Author), De Cocker, Katrien (Author), Biddle, Stuart (Author), Gavilan-Carrera, Blanca (Author), Segura-Jimenez, Victor (Author) and Bennie, Jason (Author) |
Journal Title | Preventive Medicine |
Journal Citation | 148 |
Article Number | 106566 |
Number of Pages | 11 |
Year | 2021 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Place of Publication | United States |
ISSN | 0091-7435 |
1096-0260 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106566 |
Web Address (URL) | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009174352100150X |
Abstract | There is strong scientific evidence that muscle-strengthening exercise (i.e. use of weight machines, push‐ups, sit-ups) is independently associated with a reduced risk of multiple chronic diseases (e.g. diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease). However, prevalence rates for meeting the muscle-strengthening exercise guideline (≥2 times/week) are significantly lower (~20%) than those reported to meet the aerobic physical activity guideline (e.g. walking, jogging, cycling) (~50%). It is therefore important to understand public health surveillance approaches to assess muscle-strengthening exercise. The aim of this review was to describe muscle-strengthening exercise assessment in public health surveillance. Informed by the PRISMA guidelines, an extensive keyword search was undertaken across 7 electronic data bases. We identified 86,672 possible articles and following screening (n = 1,140 in full-text) against specific inclusion criteria (adults aged ≥18 years, English, studies containing <1000 participants), extracted data from 156 manuscripts. Fifty-eight different survey systems were identified across 17 countries. Muscle-strengthening exercise frequency (85.3%), duration (23.7%) and intensity (1.3%) were recorded. Muscle-strengthening exercise questions varied significantly, with some (11.5%) requiring a singular ‘yes’ vs ‘no’ response, while others (7.7%) sought specific details (e.g. muscle groups targeted). Assessments of duration and intensity were inconsistent. Very few studies measured the validity (0.6%) and reliability (1.3%) of muscle-strengthening exercise questions. Discrepancy exists within the current assessment systems/surveys used to assess muscle-strengthening exercise in public health surveillance. This is likely to impede efforts to identify at risk groups and trends within physical activity surveillance, and to accurately assess associations between muscle-strengthening exercise and health-related outcomes. |
Keywords | assessment; measurement; muscle-strengthening exercise; public health surveillance |
Related Output | |
Is part of | Muscle-strengthening exercise and public health assessment and monitoring |
Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 420799. Sports science and exercise not elsewhere classified |
420699. Public health not elsewhere classified | |
Public Notes | File reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/author. |
This article is part of a UniSQ Thesis by publication. See Related Output. | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
Byline Affiliations | Physically Active Lifestyles Research Group |
University of Granada, Spain | |
University of Cádiz, Spain |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q65zq/assessment-of-muscle-strengthening-exercise-in-public-health-surveillance-for-adults-a-systematic-review
Download files
254
total views138
total downloads40
views this month1
downloads this month