Article Title | Promoting participation in physical activity through Snacktivity: A qualitative mixed methods study |
---|
ERA Journal ID | 39745 |
---|
Article Category | Article |
---|
Authors | Krouwel, Matthew, Greenfield, Sheila M., Chalkley, Anna, Sanders, James P., Parretti, Helen M., Gokal, Kajal, Jolly, Kate, Skrybant, Magdalena, Biddle, Stuart J. H., Greaves, Colin, Maddison, Ralph, Mutrie, Nanette, Ives, Natalie, Esliger, Dale W., Sherar, Lauren, Edwardson, Charlotte L., Yates, Tom Yates, Frew, Emma, Tearne, Sarah and Daley, Amanda J. |
---|
Journal Title | PLoS One |
---|
Journal Citation | 18 (9) |
---|
Article Number | e0291040 |
---|
Number of Pages | 18 |
---|
Year | 2023 |
---|
Publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
---|
Place of Publication | United States |
---|
ISSN | 1932-6203 |
---|
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291040 |
---|
Web Address (URL) | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291040 |
---|
Abstract | Background Public health guidance acknowledges the benefits of physical activity of any duration. We have proposed a whole-day approach to promoting physical activity called Snacktivity™, which encourages frequent 2–5 minute ‘activity snacks’ of moderate-to-vigorous intensity. Methods Using repeated semi-structured interviews and a think aloud protocol, this study aimed to understand participants’ experiences of integrating Snacktivity™ into daily life, to provide insights to refine the delivery of Snacktivity™ interventions. Physically inactive adults recruited via primary care and a community health service engaged with an intervention to encourage Snacktivity™ over three weeks, which included using a Fitbit and linked mobile phone app (SnackApp). Participants took part in semi-structured interviews on two occasions during the intervention, with a sub-group participating in a think aloud study. Three study data sets were generated and independently explored using inductive thematic analysis, with findings combined into a single set of themes. Results Eleven adults participated in the interview study who were interviewed twice (total interviews completed n = 21, 1 participant declined the second interview), of whom six completed the think aloud study (total voice recordings n = 103). Three main themes emerged from the combined data; lived experience of participating in Snacktivity™, motivation for Snacktivity™ and experiences with the Snacktivity™ technology. Participants undertook a variety of activity snacks, utilising their environment, which they believed improved their psychological wellbeing. Participants were enthusiastic about Snacktivity™, with some stating that activity snacks were more accessible than traditional exercise, but perceived they were often prevented from doing so in the presence of others. Participants were mostly enthusiastic about using the Snacktivity™ technology. Conclusion Participants were able to incorporate Snacktivity™ into their lives, particularly at home, and found this approach acceptable. Participants felt they experienced health benefits from Snacktivity™ although barriers to participation were reported. This study offers insights for translating guidance into practice and supporting people to become more physically active. |
---|
Keywords | Snacktivity; Public health; physical activity |
---|
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 420799. Sports science and exercise not elsewhere classified |
---|
Byline Affiliations | Loughborough University, United Kingdom |
---|
| University of Birmingham, United Kingdom |
---|
| Bradford Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom |
---|
| University of East Anglia, United Kingdom |
---|
| University of Southern Queensland |
---|
| Centre for Health Research |
---|
| Deakin University |
---|
| University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom |
---|
| University of Leicester, United Kingdom |
---|
| NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom |
---|