The role of justice in negotiation
Edited book (chapter)
Chapter Title | The role of justice in negotiation |
---|---|
Book Chapter Category | Edited book (chapter) |
ERA Publisher ID | 3337 |
Book Title | Handbook of group decision and negotiation |
Authors | Albin, Cecilia (Author) and Druckman, Daniel (Author) |
Editors | Kilgour, D. Marc and Eden, Colin |
Page Range | 109-119 |
Series | Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation |
Number of Pages | 11 |
Year | 2010 |
Publisher | Springer |
Place of Publication | Dordrecht, Netherlands |
ISBN | 9789048190966 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3_7 |
Web Address (URL) | http://www.springerlink.com/content/mh6211865m6x3751/fulltext.pdf |
Abstract | This chapter discusses the role of justice in negotiation between rival parties and the durability of peace agreements. It draws on research about group negotiation processes and agreements to end civil wars, mostly during the early 1990s. Hypothesized relationships between the presence and importance of distributive justice (DJ) in the agreements, and their durability, were first explored with multiple methods (see also the chapter by Koeszegi and Vetschera, this volume). The difficulty of the conflict environment was shown to have the strongest impact on durability. However, the DJ principle of equality was found to reduce the negative impact of difficult environments. An emphasis on equality was also associated with more forward-looking agreements, which were found to be more durable than those that were backward looking. (See also the chapters by Nurmi, Klamber, Kilgour and Hipel, Turel, and Yuan, this volume for modeling approaches to issues of justice and fairness.) Next, the presence and importance of procedural justice (PJ) were examined in the negotiation processes that led to the signing of the peace agreements. Significantly more durable agreements occurred when a process based on PJ led to agreements that emphasized equality. This focus on process is similar to the analyses conducted by the authors chapters (See also the chapter by Koeszegi and Vetschera, Kersten and Lai, this volume). A close examination of how the equality principle was applied revealed that agreements based on provisions of equal treatment and/or equal shares were particularly durable. The chapter concludes with a discussion of tactics used by third parties to produce durable agreements, and lessons for policy. |
Keywords | negotiation; international relations; peace agreements |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 500104. Human rights and justice issues (excl. law) |
440808. International relations | |
440804. Defence studies | |
Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
Byline Affiliations | Uppsala University, Sweden |
Public Memory Research Centre | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q0v65/the-role-of-justice-in-negotiation
Download files
2149
total views1112
total downloads1
views this month1
downloads this month