Fiber trapping comparison of embeddable and locatable spinning with sirofil and siro core-spinning with flute pipe air suction
Article
Article Title | Fiber trapping comparison of embeddable and locatable spinning with sirofil and siro core-spinning with flute pipe air suction |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 3629 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Xia, Zhigang (Author), Wang, Xin (Author), Ye, Wenxiang (Author), Eltahir, Hafiz A. (Author) and Xu, Weilin (Author) |
Journal Title | Textile Research Journal |
Journal Citation | 82 (12), pp. 1255-1262 |
Number of Pages | 8 |
Year | 2012 |
Place of Publication | London, United Kingdom |
ISSN | 0040-5175 |
1746-7748 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517512439918 |
Web Address (URL) | http://trj.sagepub.com/content/82/12/1255 |
Abstract | In this study, we compared fiber trapping of embeddable and locatable spinning (ELS) with that of sirofil and siro core-spinning with flute pipe air suction. Online pictorial analysis showed that the 3rd ELS was free of the visual fiber loss during the 1st ELS, 2nd ELS, sirofil, and siro core-spinning. This indicated the 3rd ELS possessed high ability of trapping staple fibers. Weight loss of different yarns proved that the 3rd ELS had a statistically higher fiber trapping capacity than 1st ELS, sirofil and siro core-spinning. Yarn visual appearance results showed that filaments failed to be entirely buried in the siro core-spun yarn body due to the staple fiber loss and imperfect filament tension adjustment. Poor trapping and filament fasting of staple fibers might be the reasons for more hairy siro core-spun yarn than other composite yarns. Sirofil and siro core-spun yarn had higher value of coefficient of mass variation per unit yarn length and yarn imperfections than the 3rd ELS yarn which might be probably due to their irregular fiber loss during the sirofil and siro core-spinning. The fiber loss would result in a decrease in yarn cross-section fiber utilization; therefore, sirofil, siro core-spun and the 1st ELS yarn had a statistically lower tensile tenacity than the 3rd ELS composite yarn. |
Keywords | embeddable and locatable spinning; fiber trapping; siro core-spun; sirofil |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 340309. Theory and design of materials |
401413. Textile technology | |
310602. Bioprocessing, bioproduction and bioproducts | |
Public Notes | © The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav. Permanent restricted access to published version in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
Byline Affiliations | Wuhan Textile University, China |
University of Gezira, Sudan | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q27q4/fiber-trapping-comparison-of-embeddable-and-locatable-spinning-with-sirofil-and-siro-core-spinning-with-flute-pipe-air-suction
1777
total views9
total downloads2
views this month0
downloads this month