Predictors of dieting and non-dieting approaches among adults living in Australia
Article
Article Title | Predictors of dieting and non-dieting approaches among adults living in Australia |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 13449 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Leske, Stuart (Author), Strodl, Esben (Author) and Hou, Xiang-Yu (Author) |
Journal Title | BMC Public Health |
Journal Citation | 17, pp. Article number: 214 1-18 |
Year | 2017 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd. |
Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
ISSN | 1471-2458 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4131-0 |
Web Address (URL) | https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-017-4131-0 |
Abstract | Background There is a dearth of research comparing why dieting and non-dieting approaches are adopted. A greater understanding of reasons underlying dieting and non-dieting attempts will help to identify target beliefs for interventions to support and motivate adults to attempt whatever approach they are willing and/or able to pursue. We investigated the predictors of dieting and non-dieting approaches in Australian adults using predictors that were identified in a previous qualitative study. Methods We conducted a prospective study, with two waves of data collection occurring 4 weeks apart. At baseline, participants completed a questionnaire assessing constructs drawn from the theory of planned behaviour (attitude, subjective norm, and self-efficacy), past behaviour, non-planning, attributions for dieting failure, weight control beliefs, and dieting and non-dieting intentions. We used path modelling to analyse responses. Results At baseline, 719 adults (52.2% male) aged between 18 and 76 completed the questionnaire. Four weeks later, 64% of participants (n = 461) reported on their dieting and non-dieting behaviour in the past month. Past behaviour, attitude, subjective norm, and self-identity significantly predicted dieting intentions. Dieting intentions and past behaviour significantly predicted dieting behaviour, while non-planning and self-efficacy did not. The model explained 74.8% of the variance in intention and 52.9% of the variance in behaviour. While most findings were similar for the non-dieting model, subjective norms and self-identity did not predict intention, while self-efficacy and self-identity both predicted non-dieting behaviour directly. The non-dieting model explained 58.2% of the variance in intention and 37.5% of the variance in behaviour. Conclusions The findings from this study provide support for the application of TPB and identity theory constructs in the context of both dieting and non-dieting behaviour. Self-efficacy and self-identity appear more relevant to non-dieting behaviour than dieting behaviour, while subjective norms was more influential in predicting dieting. Practitioners wishing to encourage either approach in their clients should attempt to modify the constructs that influence each approach. |
Keywords | Dieting; Identity theory; Locus of control; Non-dieting; Non-planning; Self-efficacy; Self-identity; Theory of planned behaviour; Weight control beliefs |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 420201. Behavioural epidemiology |
520302. Clinical psychology | |
420605. Preventative health care | |
Byline Affiliations | Queensland University of Technology |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q6651/predictors-of-dieting-and-non-dieting-approaches-among-adults-living-in-australia
Download files
91
total views67
total downloads3
views this month2
downloads this month