Comparison between ASTM D7205 and CSA S806 tensile-testing methods for glass-fiber-reinforced-polymer bars
Article
Article Title | Comparison between ASTM D7205 and CSA S806 tensile-testing methods for glass-fiber-reinforced-polymer bars |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 4221 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Benmokrane, Brahim (Author), Nazair, Claude (Author), Seynave, Xavier (Author) and Manalo, Allan (Author) |
Journal Title | Journal of Composites for Construction |
Journal Citation | 21 (5), pp. 1-13 |
Number of Pages | 13 |
Year | 2017 |
Publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers |
Place of Publication | Reston, VA, USA |
ISSN | 1090-0268 |
1943-5614 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000819 |
Web Address (URL) | https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000819 |
Abstract | The American Society of the International Association for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D7205 / D7205M-06 and the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) S806 contain the commonly used test methods for characterizing the tensile properties of glass-fiber-reinforced-polymer (GFRP) bars for use as reinforcement in concrete structures. These two standards, however, use different anchor dimensions and loading rates, thereby possibly yielding different properties for the same type of FRP bars. This paper assessed the results of a four-laboratory testing program comparing the sample preparation methods and test results according to ASTM D7205 and CSA S806. Each laboratory tested at least 10 samples prepared according to the recommendations in Annex A of the ASTM standard, and Annex B of CSA S806. Each type of sample was prepared by a single laboratory in order to minimize variation among the test specimens. The results show a statistically significant difference between the tensile strength measured using the CSA and ASTM provisions. Regardless of specimen preparation, the modulus of elasticity of the GFRP bars was the same with both test standards, but the ASTM standard returned a wider variation than the CSA. |
Keywords | GFRP reinforcing bars; tensile test; ASTM; CSA; tensile strength; modulus of elasticity |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 400510. Structural engineering |
400505. Construction materials | |
401602. Composite and hybrid materials | |
Public Notes | File reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/author. |
Byline Affiliations | University of Sherbrooke, Canada |
Ministry of Transport, Canada | |
No affiliation | |
Centre for Future Materials | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q4929/comparison-between-astm-d7205-and-csa-s806-tensile-testing-methods-for-glass-fiber-reinforced-polymer-bars
Download files
970
total views1713
total downloads2
views this month5
downloads this month