Validation of OMI satellite erythemal daily dose retrievals using ground-based measurements from fourteen stations
Article
Article Title | Validation of OMI satellite erythemal daily dose retrievals using ground-based measurements from fourteen stations |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 4657 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Mateos, D. (Author), Bilbao, J. (Author), Kudish, A. I. (Author), Parisi, A. V. (Author), Carbajal, G. (Author), di Sarra, A. (Author), Roman, R. (Author) and de Miguel, A. (Author) |
Journal Title | Remote Sensing of Environment: an interdisciplinary journal |
Journal Citation | 128, pp. 1-10 |
Number of Pages | 10 |
Year | 2013 |
Place of Publication | New York, NY. United States |
ISSN | 0034-4257 |
1879-0704 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.015 |
Abstract | The satellite Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) erythemal daily dose (EDD) product is validated through an inter-comparison with ground-based measurements at 14 ground-based stations distributed worldwide between 43ºN and 64ºS in 5 different countries of both hemispheres: Argentina, Australia, Italy, Israel, and Spain. The obtained results show that OMI data overestimate ground-based EDD measurements except in the high surface albedo stations (e.g., covered by snow), in agreement with the results reported by previous studies. The average differences between satellite and ground-based data reached a maximum ~25% for all-sky cases. When cloudless conditions are selected, removing intra-daily changes in cloudiness, the agreement improves, although average differences between 10-20% still appear for seven low-albedo stations. The influences of ozone and aerosol on the observed differences show opposite trends: viz., high ozone column values result in a decrease whereas high turbidity conditions produce an increase in the differences. A correction factor based on the aerosol absorbing optical thickness was applied to correct for this effect, which is not considered in the OMI algorithm. After the correction, the comparison between OMI and ground-based EDD measurements provides the best results, falling below 20% of difference for more than 90% of the cases at 8 stations. Dependence with the station altitude is also noted for both all-sky and clear-sky cases. |
Keywords | OMI; erythemal; UV; aerosols; satellite; ozone |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 370109. Tropospheric and stratospheric physics |
519999. Other physical sciences not elsewhere classified | |
370106. Atmospheric radiation | |
Public Notes | © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Published version deposited in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
Byline Affiliations | University of Valladolid, Spain |
University of the Negev, Israel | |
Australian Centre for Sustainable Catchments | |
Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina, Argentina | |
Italian National Agency for New Technologies Energy and Sustainable Development, Italy | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q1902/validation-of-omi-satellite-erythemal-daily-dose-retrievals-using-ground-based-measurements-from-fourteen-stations
1895
total views10
total downloads2
views this month0
downloads this month