Within block spatial variation in CCS: another potentially important consideration in the application of precision agriculture to sugarcane production
Paper
Paper/Presentation Title | Within block spatial variation in CCS: another potentially important consideration in the application of precision agriculture to sugarcane production |
---|---|
Presentation Type | Paper |
Authors | Bramley, R. G. V. (Author), Panitz, J. H. (Author), Jensen, T. A. (Author) and Baillie, C. P. (Author) |
Editors | Bruce, R. C. |
Journal or Proceedings Title | Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists (ASSCT 2012) |
ERA Conference ID | 50305 |
Journal Citation | 34, pp. 463-470 |
Number of Pages | 8 |
Year | 2012 |
Place of Publication | Mackay, Australia |
ISBN | 9781622764051 |
Conference/Event | 34th Annual Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists (ASSCT 2012) |
Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Conference | |
Event Details | 34th Annual Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists (ASSCT 2012) Event Date 01 to end of 04 May 2012 Event Location Palm Cove, Australia |
Event Details | Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Conference ASSCT |
Abstract | Growers adopting Precision Agriculture approaches to sugar cane production has been predominantly focussed on the use of variable rate management of fertilizers and soil amendments (VRT) to optimise yield. However, cane yield is only one component of the sugar production system; CCS (Commercial Cane Sugar) is also important. Clearly, growers using VRT to optimise yield will not want the benefit of doing so to be offset by a possible consequent CCS penalty. We collected cane stalk samples from 202 geo-referenced locations in a 6.8 ha block of cane in the Bundaberg district during the 2011 harvest and analysed them in the lab for brix, pol and CCS. CCS varied from 13.29 to 16.84 with a mean of 15.73 and median of 15.80; the coefficient of variation (CV) was only 3.5%. However, the variation in CCS was spatially structured - that is, it was not random. Brix and pol followed the same patterns of variation. Future work will seek to characterise CCS variation in potentially more variable blocks and explore the drivers of CCS variation. Nevertheless, the present results suggest that spatial variation in CCS is something that adopters of PA should consider, alongside variation in yield and soil properties. They also lend weight to the need for a harvester-mounted on-the-go sensor for CSS determination as a complement to yield monitoring technology. |
Keywords | cane stalks; commercial cane sugar; CCS |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 300206. Agricultural spatial analysis and modelling |
409901. Agricultural engineering | |
300406. Crop and pasture improvement (incl. selection and breeding) | |
Public Notes | © 2012 by Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission of the publisher. |
Byline Affiliations | Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia |
Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations, Australia | |
National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q1y5y/within-block-spatial-variation-in-ccs-another-potentially-important-consideration-in-the-application-of-precision-agriculture-to-sugarcane-production
1981
total views214
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month