Summative evaluation of climate application activities with pastoralists in western Queensland
Summative evaluation of climate application activities
|ERA Journal ID||3312|
|Authors||Cobon, D. H. (Author), Bell, K. L. (Author), Park, J. N. (Author) and Keogh, D. U. (Author)|
|Journal Title||The Rangeland Journal|
|Journal Citation||30 (3), pp. 361-374|
|Number of Pages||14|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ06030|
Survey methods were engaged to measure the change in use and knowledge of climate information by pastoralists in western Queensland. The initial mail survey was undertaken in 2000/2001 (n=43) and provided a useful benchmark of pastoralists climate knowledge. Two years of climate applications activities were completed and clients were re-surveyed in 2003 (n=49) to measure the change in knowledge and assess the effectiveness of the climate applications activities. Two methods were used to assess changes in client knowledge, viz., self-assessment and test questions. We found that the use of seasonal climate forecasts in decision making increased from 36% in 2001 (n=42) to 51% in 2003 (n=49) (P=0.07). We found that the self-assessment technique was unsatisfactory as a measure of changing knowledge over short periods (1-3 years), but the test question technique was successful and indicated an improvement in climate knowledge among respondents. The increased levels of use of seasonal climate forecasts in management and improved knowledge was partly attributed to the climate applications activities of the project.
We found that those who used seasonal forecasting (n=25) didn’t understand key components of forecasts (e.g. probability, median) better than those who didn’t use seasonal forecasts (n=24) (P>0.05). This identifies the potential for misunderstanding and misinterpretation of forecasts among users and highlights the need for providers of forecasts to understand the difficulties and prepare simply written descriptions of forecasts and disseminate these with the maps showing probabilities.
The most preferred means of accessing climate information were internet, email, The Season Ahead newsletter and newspaper. The least preferred were direct contact with extension officers and attending field days and group meetings. Eighty-six percent of respondents used the internet and 67% used ADSL Broadband Internet (April 2003). Despite these findings Extension Officers play a key role in preparing and publishing the information on the web, in emails and newsletters. We also believe that direct contact with Extension Officers trained in climate applications is desirable in workshop-like events to improve knowledge of the difficult concepts underpinning climate forecasts, which may then stimulate further adoption.
|Keywords||changed knowledge, grazier, quantitative data, ranchers, seasonal climate forecasting|
|ANZSRC Field of Research 2020||300208. Farm management, rural management and agribusiness|
|Byline Affiliations||Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, Australia|
|Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland|
|Queensland University of Technology|
|Institution of Origin||University of Southern Queensland|
0views this month
0downloads this month