Disease severity assessment in epidemiological studies: accuracy and reliability of visual estimates of Septoria leaf blotch (SLB) in winter wheat
Poster
Paper/Presentation Title | Disease severity assessment in epidemiological studies: accuracy and reliability of visual estimates of Septoria leaf blotch (SLB) in winter wheat |
---|---|
Presentation Type | Poster |
Authors | El Jarroudi, Moussa (Author), Kouadio, Louis (Author), Mackels, Christophe (Author), Tychon, Bernard (Author), Delfosse, Philippe (Author) and Bock, Clive H. (Author) |
Journal or Proceedings Title | Phytopathology: International Journal of the American Phytopathological Society |
Journal Citation | 104 (Suppl. 3, No. 11), p. S3.37 |
Article Number | S3.37 |
Number of Pages | 1 |
Year | 2014 |
Publisher | American Phytopathological Society |
Place of Publication | United States |
ISSN | 0031-949X |
1943-7684 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-104-11-S3.1 |
Conference/Event | 2014 APS-CPS Joint Meeting |
Event Details | 2014 APS-CPS Joint Meeting Event Date 09 to end of 13 Aug 2014 Event Location Minneapolis, United States of America |
Abstract | Several methods are available to measure the severity of Septoria leaf blotch (SLB) of winter wheat but differ in accuracy, reliability, ease of use and rapidity. The accuracy and reliability of visual assessments of SLB severity by raters was determined by comparison with assumed actual values obtained by digital image analysis. Raters included one plant pathologist with extensive experience of visual disease assessment, and three other raters who were trained prior to field observations using standard area diagrams and the software DISTRAIN. Initially analyses were performed using SLB severity over the full 0-100% range; subsequently, to explore error over short ranges of the 0-100% scale, the scale was divided into sequential 10%-increments (i.e., 0-10%, 10-20%,…90-100%) based on the actual values. Lin’s concordance correlation (LCC) analysis demonstrated that all raters were accurate when compared over the whole severity range (LCC coefficient (ρc) = 0.92-0.99). However, agreement between actual SLB severities and the estimates by raters was less good when compared over the short intervals of the 10×10% classes (ρc = -0.12-0.99, depending on the percentage class and the experiment), demonstrating that agreement will vary depending on the actual disease range over which it is compared. Inter-rater reliability over the full 0-100% range measured using correlation analysis was high between each pair of raters (r = 0.970 to 0.992, P<0.0001), which was confirmed by the inter-class correlation coefficient (ρ ≥ 0.927). This study provides new insight into using a full range of actual disease severity versus limited ranges to ensure a realistic measure of rater accuracy and reliability, in addition to contributing to the ongoing debate on the use of visual disease estimates based on the 0-100% ratio scale for epidemiological research. |
Keywords | Septoria leaf blotch |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 300409. Crop and pasture protection (incl. pests, diseases and weeds) |
Public Notes | Abstract only. |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
Byline Affiliations | University of Liege, Belgium |
Agriculture and Agri-Food, Canada | |
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Luxembourg | |
California Department of Food and Agriculture, United States |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q6635/disease-severity-assessment-in-epidemiological-studies-accuracy-and-reliability-of-visual-estimates-of-septoria-leaf-blotch-slb-in-winter-wheat
80
total views9
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month