More equal than others? A comparative analysis of state and non-state perceptions of interest representation and decision-making in REDD+ negotiations
Article
Article Title | More equal than others? A comparative analysis of state and non-state perceptions of interest representation and decision-making in REDD+ negotiations |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 124409 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Cadman, Tim (Author) and Maraseni, Tek (Author) |
Journal Title | Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research |
Journal Citation | 26 (3), pp. 214-230 |
Number of Pages | 17 |
Year | 2013 |
Place of Publication | Abingdon, OX. United Kingdom |
ISSN | 1351-1610 |
1469-8412 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2013.771880 |
Abstract | This paper provides a quantitative analysis of stakeholder perceptions regarding the governance of the UN climate change negotiations on reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries (REDD+). Governance quality and legitimacy were evaluated by means of an online survey conducted in 2011, using a normative framework of principles, criteria and |
Keywords | global environmental governance; interest representation; decision making; quality; legitimacy; REDD+ |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 350799. Strategy, management and organisational behaviour not elsewhere classified |
300707. Forestry management and environment | |
440704. Environment policy | |
Public Notes | © 2013 Copyright ICCR Foundation. Published online 1 May 2013. |
Byline Affiliations | Griffith University |
Australian Centre for Sustainable Catchments | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q1yq4/more-equal-than-others-a-comparative-analysis-of-state-and-non-state-perceptions-of-interest-representation-and-decision-making-in-redd-negotiations
1896
total views10
total downloads1
views this month0
downloads this month