Estimating the willingness to pay for regulating and cultural ecosystem services from forested Siwalik landscapes: perspectives of disaggregated users
Article
Article Title | Estimating the willingness to pay for regulating and cultural ecosystem services from forested Siwalik landscapes: perspectives of disaggregated users |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 5666 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Acharya, Ram Prasad (Author), Maraseni, Tek Narayan (Author) and Cockfield, Geoff (Author) |
Journal Title | Annals of Forest Science |
Journal Citation | 78, pp. 1-27 |
Article Number | 51 |
Number of Pages | 27 |
Year | 2021 |
Place of Publication | France |
ISSN | 1286-4560 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-021-01046-3 |
Web Address (URL) | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13595-021-01046-3 |
Abstract | Key message: We assessed forest users’ willingness to pay (WTP) for regulating and cultural forest services based on their socio-economic status (rich vs. poor), proximity to forests (nearby vs. distant), and forest management modalities (community forestry vs. collaborative forest management). As expected, a huge variation was found in WTP among these sub-groups. The wealthier households (HH) preferred ‘cash’ whereas poor HHs preferred ‘labour’ as a payment option. Context: Forest’s ecosystem services (FES) research have largely concentrated on aggregated economic valuation, while minimal consideration has been paid to distributional issues of willingness to pay (WTP) of many regulating and cultural services such as water quality improvement (WQI), flood control (FC), and bequest and aesthetic values. Aims: We assessed WTP of high-priority FES to the various sub-groups (nearby/distant, rich/poor and community/collaborative forest users) and explored the preferred payment options among the sub-groups in the Siwalik landscape of Nepal. Methods: We carried out contingent valuation survey of 253 households (ranging from 31 to 33 households from each of the sub-groups). We performed the generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) to analyse the data in RStudio. Results: Spatial distance and wealth levels of the respondents play a crucial role in WTP of FES. GLMM analysis indicated that WTP of non-marketed FES differed in terms of cash and labour format. Generally, the WTP is higher in wealthier sub-groups as a cash option. WTP in-terms of labour is a better option for poor HH. Conclusion: Disaggregated WTP should be considered while designing future forest management interventions. |
Keywords | Valuation; Economic contribution; Flood control; Water quality improvement; Bequest value; Aesthetic value |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 410404. Environmental management |
Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
Byline Affiliations | Centre for Sustainable Agricultural Systems |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q6606/estimating-the-willingness-to-pay-for-regulating-and-cultural-ecosystem-services-from-forested-siwalik-landscapes-perspectives-of-disaggregated-users
164
total views7
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month