Evaluating the importance of rural internships to subsequent medical workforce distribution outcomes: An Australian cohort study
Article
Article Title | Evaluating the importance of rural internships to subsequent medical workforce distribution outcomes: An Australian cohort study |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 200230 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | McGrail, Matthew R, Fox, Jordan and Martin, Priya |
Journal Title | BMJ Open |
Journal Citation | 14 (10) |
Article Number | e084784 |
Number of Pages | 8 |
Year | 2024 |
Publisher | BMJ |
Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
ISSN | 2044-6055 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084784 |
Web Address (URL) | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/10/e084784 |
Abstract | Objective To evaluate the importance of rural internships to observed medical workforce distribution outcomes up to 8 years post-medical school. Design and setting Cohort study of medical graduates of The University of Queensland (UQ), Australia. Participants UQ graduates who were medical interns in Queensland’s public health system between 2014 and 2021 and observed working in Australia in 2022. Internship location was defined as being metropolitan or rural, along with other key rural exposures of whether they are of rural origin (childhood) and whether at least 1 year of clinical training at medical school was in a rural location. Primary outcome measure Current work location was collected from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) in 2022, classified as either rural or metropolitan and measured in association with their internship location. Results From 1930 eligible graduates, 21.5% took up a rural internship, which was associated with rural origin (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0) and medical school rural immersions of either 1 year (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.1 to 3.7) or 2 years (OR 5.8, 95% CI 4.4 to 7.7). Completing a rural internship was associated with currently working rural (47% vs 14%, OR 4.6, 95% CI 3.5 to 5.9), which weakened the observed (adjusted) effect of rural origin (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.0) or medical school rural immersions (1 year: OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.9; 2 years: OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.3). All combinations of the key rural exposures that included rural internship had the highest proportions currently working rurally (range 32–69%) compared with the combinations with a metropolitan internship (range 12–22%). Conclusions Internship location appears to be a critical factor in shaping medical workforce distribution decisions. This evidence supports the need for strengthened and expanded rural training pathways after medical school. In particular, clearer pathways into specialty programmes via rural internships are likely to support increased numbers choosing (with confidence) to preference rural internship first and subsequently more working in rural areas long term. |
Keywords | medical workforce distribution |
Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 4299. Other health sciences |
Byline Affiliations | University of Queensland |
University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/zv04q/evaluating-the-importance-of-rural-internships-to-subsequent-medical-workforce-distribution-outcomes-an-australian-cohort-study
Download files
0
total views0
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month