A Realist Evaluation of Theory about Triggers for Doctors Choosing a Generalist or Specialist Medical Career
Article
O’Sullivan, Belinda, McGrail, Matthew, Gurney, Tiana and Martin, Priya. 2020. "A Realist Evaluation of Theory about Triggers for Doctors Choosing a Generalist or Specialist Medical Career." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17 (22). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228566
Article Title | A Realist Evaluation of Theory about Triggers for Doctors Choosing a Generalist or Specialist Medical Career |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 44293 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | O’Sullivan, Belinda, McGrail, Matthew, Gurney, Tiana and Martin, Priya |
Journal Title | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Journal Citation | 17 (22) |
Article Number | 8566 |
Number of Pages | 17 |
Year | 2020 |
Publisher | MDPI AG |
Place of Publication | Switzerland |
ISSN | 1660-4601 |
1661-7827 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228566 |
Web Address (URL) | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8566 |
Abstract | There is a lack of theory about what drives choice to be a generalist or specialist doctor, an important issue in many countries for increasing primary/preventative care. We did a realist evaluation to develop a theory to inform what works for whom, when and in what contexts, to yield doctors’ choice to be a generalist or specialist. We interviewed 32 Australian doctors (graduates of a large university medical school) who had decided on a generalist (GP/public health) or specialist (all other specialties) career. They reflected on their personal responses to experiences at different times to stimulate their choice. Theory was refined and confirmed by testing it with 17 additional doctors of various specialties/career stages and by referring to wider literature. Our final theory showed the decision involved multi-level contextual factors intersecting with eight triggers to produce either a specialist or generalist choice. Both clinical and place-based exposures, as well as attributes, skills, norms and status of different fields affected choice. This occurred relative to the interests and expectations of different doctors, including their values for professional, socio-economic and lifestyle rewards, often intersecting with issues like gender and life stage. Applying this theory, it is possible to tailor selection and ongoing exposures to yield more generalists. |
Keywords | career choice; generalist; general practice; specialist; medical training; doctors; realist evaluation; theory; experience; norms; attributes |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 4203. Health services and systems |
Byline Affiliations | University of Queensland |
Permalink -
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/z9z93/a-realist-evaluation-of-theory-about-triggers-for-doctors-choosing-a-generalist-or-specialist-medical-career
Download files
10
total views2
total downloads3
views this month0
downloads this month