Development and evaluation of the cascade correlation neural network and the random forest models for river stage and river flow prediction in Australia
Article
Article Title | Development and evaluation of the cascade correlation neural network and the random forest models for river stage and river flow prediction in Australia |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 36486 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali (Author), Deo, Ravinesh C. (Author), Kim, Sungwon (Author), Kashani, Mahasa Hasanpour (Author), Karimi, Vahid (Author) and Izadkhah, Maryam (Author) |
Journal Title | Soft Computing |
Journal Citation | 24, pp. 12079-12090 |
Number of Pages | 12 |
Year | 2020 |
Publisher | Springer |
Place of Publication | Germany |
ISSN | 1432-7643 |
1433-7479 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04648-2 |
Web Address (URL) | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00500-019-04648-2 |
Abstract | Accurately predicting river flows over daily timescales is considered as an important task for sustainable management of freshwater ecosystems, agricultural applications, and water resources management. In this research paper, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, namely the cascade correlation neural networks (CCNN) and the random forest (RF) models, were employed in daily river stage and river flow prediction for two river systems (i.e., Dulhunty River and Herbert River) in Australia. To develop the CCNN and RF models, a significant 3-day antecedent river stage and river flow time series were used. 80% of the whole data were used for model training and the remaining 20% for model testing. A total of ten different model structures with different input combinations were used to evaluate the optimal model in the training phase, and the results were analyzed using statistical metrics including the root mean square error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient (NS), Willmott’s index of agreement (WI), and Legate and McCabe’s index (ELM) in the testing phase. The inter-comparison of CCNN and RF models for both river systems showed that the CCNN model was able to generate a more accurate prediction of the river stage and river flow compared to the RF model. Due to hydro-geographic differences leading to a different underlying historical data characteristics, the optimal CCNN’s performance for the Dulhunty River was found to be most accurate, in terms of ELM = 0.779, WI = 0.964, and ENS = 0.862 versus 0.775, 0.968, and 0.885 for the Herbert River. Following the performance accuracies, the authors ascertained that the CCNN model can be taken as a preferred data intelligent tool for river stage and river flow prediction. |
Keywords | Australia, cascade correlation neural networks, prediction, random forest, river flow |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 469999. Other information and computing sciences not elsewhere classified |
410404. Environmental management | |
Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
Byline Affiliations | Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam |
School of Sciences | |
Dongyang University, Korea | |
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran | |
University of Tabriz, Iran | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q5895/development-and-evaluation-of-the-cascade-correlation-neural-network-and-the-random-forest-models-for-river-stage-and-river-flow-prediction-in-australia
177
total views9
total downloads2
views this month0
downloads this month