Water quality management using hybrid machine learning and data mining algorithms: An indexing approach
Article
Article Title | Water quality management using hybrid machine learning and data mining algorithms: An indexing approach |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 210567 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Aslam, Bilal (Author), Maqsoom, Ahsen (Author), Cheema, Ali Hassan (Author), Ullah, Fahim (Author), Alharbi, Abdullah (Author) and Imran, Muhammad (Author) |
Journal Title | IEEE Access |
Journal Citation | 10, pp. 119692 - 119705 |
Number of Pages | 14 |
Year | 2022 |
Publisher | IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) |
Place of Publication | United States |
ISSN | 2169-3536 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3221430 |
Web Address (URL) | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9945948 |
Abstract | One of the key functions of global water resource management authorities is river water quality (WQ) assessment. A water quality index (WQI) is developed for water assessments considering numerous quality-related variables. WQI assessments typically take a long time and are prone to errors during sub-indices generation. This can be tackled through the latest machine learning (ML) techniques that are renowned for superior accuracy. In this study, water samples were taken from the wells in the study area (North Pakistan) to develop WQI prediction models. Four standalone algorithms, i.e., random trees (RT), random forest (RF), M5P, and reduced error pruning tree (REPT), were used in this study. In addition, 12 hybrid data-mining algorithms (combination of standalone, bagging (BA), cross-validation parameter selection (CVPS), and randomizable filtered classification (RFC)) were also used. Using the 10-fold cross-validation technique, the data were separated into two groups (70:30) for algorithm creation. Ten random input permutations were created using Pearson correlation coefficients to identify the best possible combination of datasets for improving the algorithm prediction. The variables with very low correlations performed poorly, whereas hybrid algorithms increased the prediction capability of numerous standalone algorithms. Hybrid RT-Artificial Neural Network (RT-ANN) with RMSE = 2.319, MAE = 2.248, NSE = 0.945 and PBIAS = -0.64, outperformed all other algorithms. Most algorithms overestimated WQI values except for BA-RF, RF, BA-REPT, REPT, RFC-M5P, RFC-REPT, and ANN- Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). |
Keywords | Prediction algorithms; Water pollution; Classification algorithms; Water quality; Rivers; Random forests; Machine learning algorithms; Indexes; Machine learning; Data mining |
Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 339999. Other built environment and design not elsewhere classified |
400513. Water resources engineering | |
410504. Surface water quality processes and contaminated sediment assessment | |
461199. Machine learning not elsewhere classified | |
330201. Automation and technology in building and construction | |
400411. Water treatment processes | |
401302. Geospatial information systems and geospatial data modelling | |
Byline Affiliations | Northern Arizona University, United States |
COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan | |
School of Surveying and Built Environment | |
King Saud University, Saudi Arabia | |
Federation University | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q7wz6/water-quality-management-using-hybrid-machine-learning-and-data-mining-algorithms-an-indexing-approach
Download files
Published Version
Water_Quality_Management_Using_Hybrid_Machine_Learning_and_Data_Mining_Algorithms_An_Indexing_Approach.pdf | ||
License: CC BY 4.0 | ||
File access level: Anyone |
76
total views131
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month