A comparison of methods for mapping golf greens
Article
Article Title | A comparison of methods for mapping golf greens |
---|---|
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Reynolds, Wade (Author), Young, Frank R. (Author) and Gibbings, Peter (Author) |
Journal Title | Spatial Science Queensland |
Journal Citation | 2007 (4), pp. 33-36 |
Number of Pages | 4 |
Year | 2007 |
Place of Publication | South Brisbane, Queensland |
Abstract | Several golf greens were mapped using a RTK GPS, Riegl 3D-Laser Mirror Scanner and Trimble S6 Robotic Total Station systems to determine the most appropriate method for this task. The RTK GPS was the easiest methods for data capture but was insufficiently accurate for mapping at a contour interval of 0.05 m or less in this situation. The laser scanner level data accuracy was slightly more accurate than the robotic total station but both produces results that were suitable for golf green mapping. However, the ease of use of the robotic total station determined this as the preferred methodology for golf green mapping with a 0.05m contour interval. |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 401306. Surveying (incl. hydrographic surveying) |
Public Notes | Author retains copyright. |
Byline Affiliations | Faculty of Engineering and Surveying |
Australian Centre for Sustainable Catchments |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/9y551/a-comparison-of-methods-for-mapping-golf-greens
Download files
2233
total views2179
total downloads4
views this month0
downloads this month