Practice-led research and the myth of rigour
Article
Article Title | Practice-led research and the myth of rigour |
---|---|
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Scholtes, Mark (Author) and Batorowicz, Beata (Author) |
Journal Title | NiTRO: Creative Matters |
Number of Pages | 4 |
Year | 2019 |
Publisher | Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts |
Place of Publication | Melbourne, Australia |
Web Address (URL) | https://nitro.edu.au/articles/2019/8/23/practice-led-research-and-the-myth-of-rigor |
Abstract | The process of determining creative works as rigorous productions of new knowledge is complex. As artists-academics, we assert that practice-led research is distinct from other disciplinary research, in the very form of rigour and evaluation processes in which these creative works require. Contextually, our premise is underpinned by broader university implications of creative research being measured against the criteria of traditional research, with its quality metrics often referencing the Sciences (Eisner 2015). We therefore, emphasise creative research as holding its own 'creative rigour', encompassing complex intersections of academy and industry. |
Keywords | Practice-led research, creative rigour, creative arts, arts practice |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 369999. Other creative arts and writing not elsewhere classified |
360699. Visual arts not elsewhere classified | |
Public Notes | © The Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Creative Arts. |
Byline Affiliations | School of Arts and Communication |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q5643/practice-led-research-and-the-myth-of-rigour
Download files
Published Version
Practice-led Research and the Myth of Rigour — Non _ Traditional Research Outcomes.pdf | ||
File access level: Anyone |
309
total views135
total downloads1
views this month3
downloads this month