Crash risk perception of sleepy driving and its comparisons with drink driving and speeding: Which behavior is perceived as the riskiest?
Article
Article Title | Crash risk perception of sleepy driving and its comparisons with drink driving and speeding: Which behavior is perceived as the riskiest? |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 30196 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Watling, Christopher N. (Author), Armstrong, Kerry A. (Author), Smith, Simon S. (Author) and Obst, Patricia L. (Author) |
Journal Title | Traffic Injury Prevention |
Journal Citation | 47 (4), pp. 400-405 |
Number of Pages | 6 |
Year | 2016 |
Place of Publication | United States |
ISSN | 1538-957X |
1538-9588 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2015.1096350 |
Web Address (URL) | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15389588.2015.1096350 |
Abstract | Objective: Driver sleepiness is a major crash risk factor but may be underrecognized as a risky driving behavior. Sleepy driving is usually rated as less of a road safety issue than more well-known risky driving behaviors, such as drink driving and speeding. The objective of this study was to compare perception of crash risk of sleepy driving, drink driving, and speeding. Methods: Three hundred Australian drivers completed a questionnaire that assessed crash risk perceptions for sleepy driving, drink driving, and speeding. Additionally, the participants' perceptions of crash risk were assessed for 5 different contextual scenarios that included different levels of sleepiness (low, high), driving duration (short, long), and time of day/circadian influences (afternoon, nighttime) of driving. Results: The analysis confirmed that sleepy driving was considered a risky driving behavior but not as risky as high levels of speeding (P <.05). Yet, the risk of crashing at 4 a.m. was considered as equally risky as low levels of speeding (10 km over the limit). The comparisons of the contextual scenarios revealed driving scenarios that would arguably be perceived as quite risky because time of day/circadian influences were not reported as high risk. Conclusions: The results suggest a lack of awareness or appreciation of circadian rhythm functioning, particularly the descending phase of circadian rhythm that promotes increased sleepiness in the afternoon and during the early hours of the morning. Yet, the results suggested an appreciation of the danger associated with long-distance driving and driver sleepiness. Further efforts are required to improve the community's awareness of the impairing effects from sleepiness and, in particular, knowledge regarding the human circadian rhythm and the increased sleep propensity during the circadian nadir. |
Keywords | Australian drivers; crask risk perception; drink driving; sleepy driving; speeding |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 520402. Decision making |
420604. Injury prevention | |
520401. Cognition | |
Public Notes | File reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/author. |
Byline Affiliations | Queensland University of Technology |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q6zz8/crash-risk-perception-of-sleepy-driving-and-its-comparisons-with-drink-driving-and-speeding-which-behavior-is-perceived-as-the-riskiest
Download files
Accepted Version
ePRINTS Watling 2016 Risk Perceptions of Sleepy Driving.pdf | ||
File access level: Anyone |
68
total views90
total downloads1
views this month1
downloads this month