Reading and Responding: Literature, Ethics and Citizenship
Presentation
Paper/Presentation Title | Reading and Responding: Literature, Ethics and Citizenship |
---|---|
Presentation Type | Presentation |
Authors | |
Author | Bedford, Alison |
Year | 2017 |
Place of Publication | Brisbane, Australia |
Conference/Event | Reading and Writing in the 21st Century Literary Studies Classroom: Theory and Practice |
Event Details | Reading and Writing in the 21st Century Literary Studies Classroom: Theory and Practice Event Date 06 to end of 08 Jul 2017 Event Location Brisbane, Australia |
Abstract | Martha Nussbaum’s argument that literature cultivates 'powers of imagination that are essential to citizenship' centres on literature as a vehicle for empathy. Yet Suzanne Keen suggests 'a society that insists on receiving immediate ethical and political yields from the recreational reading of its citizens puts too great a burden on both empathy and the novel' (168). While Nussbaum and Keen offer differing positions on the social function of literature, both focus on its ethical function, suggesting reading should affect readers’ sense of responsibility to others in society. As Harpham describes, 'Ethics is the arena in which the claims of otherness - the moral law, the human other, cultural norms, the Good-in-itself etc. - are articulated and negotiated' (394). This paper will offer a reading of Mary Shelley as a Foucauldian founder of discourse. In doing so, it will argue that Shelley established a new way for readers to navigate ethical questions: Frankenstein results in the reader responding to 'the claims of otherness' precisely because Shelley does not provide them with a response - she leaves it to the reader to decide which ethical consideration takes primacy. She 'articulates' but allows the reader to 'negotiate'. It is this new discourse, most often articulated through the genre of science fiction which explores 'who we are and might be' (Nussbaum, 2323), that results only not in an empathetic response but in an ethical one. Literature, and particularly the unanswered ‘what if?’ of science fiction as established by Shelley, provides readers the space to engage with the ethical demands of their citizenry. |
Keywords | ethics, Frankenstein, Mary Shelley, literature, empathy, citizenry, literature |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 470208. Culture, representation and identity |
470504. British and Irish literature | |
470207. Cultural theory | |
Public Notes | File reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/author. |
Byline Affiliations | School of Arts and Communication |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q79w9/reading-and-responding-literature-ethics-and-citizenship
Download files
Submitted Version
Reading and Responding Literature, Ethics and Citizenship BEDFORD (1).pdf | ||
File access level: Anyone |
19
total views13
total downloads0
views this month1
downloads this month
Export as
Related outputs
Remixing Influencers: Academics Reading and Writing About Philosophy and Pop Culture
Barnes, N., Bedford, A., Jefferies, M., McCandless, T., Thomas, M. and Firth, K.. "Remixing Influencers: Academics Reading and Writing About Philosophy and Pop Culture." Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) 2022 Annual Conference. Adelaide, South Australia 27 Nov - 01 Dec 2022Critical and collaborative problem-solving: An action research project on the development of cognition-centred inquiry for Year 11 senior history
Bedford, Alison. 2023. "Critical and collaborative problem-solving: An action research project on the development of cognition-centred inquiry for Year 11 senior history." Impact. (18).Direct and Indirect Benefits: an Open Peer Review of Zamarti, L. & Nally, D. (2023). The impact of archaeology professional development on history teachers’ pedagogy.
Bedford, Alison. 2023. "Direct and Indirect Benefits: an Open Peer Review of Zamarti, L. & Nally, D. (2023). The impact of archaeology professional development on history teachers’ pedagogy. " Public History Review. 11 (1).If these stones could speak: War memorials and contested memory
Kerby, Martin, Baguley, Margaret, Bedford, Alison and Gehrmann, Richard. 2021. "If these stones could speak: War memorials and contested memory." Historical Encounters. 8 (3), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.52289/hej8.301In the Heart of the Land and the People they Loved: Community responses to commemoration
Kerby, Martin, Maddock, Daniel, Gehrmann, Richard, Baguley, Margaret and Bedford, Alison. 2021. In the Heart of the Land and the People they Loved: Community responses to commemoration. Toowoomba, Australia.Implied Rather than Intended? Children’s Picture Books, Civil Religion, and the First Landing on the Moon
Kerby, Martin, Baguley, Margaret, Bedford, Alison and Maddock, Daniel. 2022. "Implied Rather than Intended? Children’s Picture Books, Civil Religion, and the First Landing on the Moon." Children's Literature in Education: an international quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-022-09519-3What you should know now about the NSW government and Dolores Umbridge’s evil ways [Blog post]
Bedford, Alison. 2022. "What you should know now about the NSW government and Dolores Umbridge’s evil ways [Blog post]." EduResearch Matters: A Voice for Australian Education Researchers. 7 November 2022.