Interventions for prostate cancer survivorship: a systematic review of reviews
Article
Article Title | Interventions for prostate cancer survivorship: a systematic review of reviews |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 6624 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Crawford-Williams, Fiona (Author), March, Sonja (Author), Goodwin, Belinda C. (Author), Ralph, Nicholas (Author), Galvao, Daniel A. (Author), Newton, Robert U. (Author), Chambers, Suzanne K. (Author) and Dunn, Jeff (Author) |
Journal Title | Psycho-Oncology: journal of the psychological, social and behavioral dimensions of cancer |
Journal Citation | 27 (10), pp. 2339-2348 |
Number of Pages | 10 |
Year | 2018 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons |
Place of Publication | United Kingdom |
ISSN | 1057-9249 |
1099-1611 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4888 |
Web Address (URL) | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pon.4888 |
Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for interventions addressing key domains of the American Cancer Society (ACS) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines: health promotion, surveillance, physical side effects, psychosocial management, and care coordination. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventions targeting ACS/ASCO guideline domains. All titles and abstracts were independently assessed for inclusion based on predetermined criteria. Relevant data were extracted, and assessment of methodological quality was performed. RESULTS: Forty-four systematic reviews of interventions targeting ACS prostate cancer guideline domains were included for review. Exercise and psychosocial interventions were effective for improving men's survivorship outcomes in the domains of health promotion, physical side effects, and psychosocial management. Across the domains, evidence quality varied and there was a limited diversity of participants. No reviews of interventions addressing surveillance and cancer care coordination were identified. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantive knowledge gaps in prostate cancer survivorship research that are a barrier to real improvements in men's outcomes across the breadth of the survivorship experience. A targeted research and implementation agenda in prostate cancer survivorship is urgently needed if we are to meet the current and future burden of this disease on individuals, families, and communities. |
Keywords | prostate cancer, survivorship, interventions, systematic review |
Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 429999. Other health sciences not elsewhere classified |
520399. Clinical and health psychology not elsewhere classified | |
Public Notes | File reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher/author. |
Byline Affiliations | Institute for Resilient Regions |
Edith Cowan University | |
Griffith University | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q4y89/interventions-for-prostate-cancer-survivorship-a-systematic-review-of-reviews
Download files
306
total views1010
total downloads5
views this month1
downloads this month