Mapping the Transition to Automotive Circularity: A Systematic Review of Reverse Supply Chain Implementation

Mapping the Transition to Automotive Circularity: A Systematic
Review of Reverse Supply Chain Implementation

The automotive industry’s shift to a Circular Economy for global sustainability is vital, but it faces challenges when establishing efficient Reverse Supply Chains. Reverse Supply
Chain implementation is dependent on multiple barriers and enablers, including economic, managerial, technological, regulatory, and social domains, thus making single-factor solutions ineffective. The purpose of this review is to conduct a systematic literature review to understand how these interconnected barriers and enablers can collectively shape Reverse Supply Chain implementation and performance, specifically within the automotive sector, which remains little known. The PRISMA framework was utilised, which resulted in 129 peer-reviewed articles being selected for review. Findings showed that the literature focuses primarily on Electric Vehicle batteries within developing economies, particularly China. Reverse Supply Chain implementation is governed not only by isolated barriers but by complex systemic interdependencies between enablers as well. This complex interrelationship between barriers and enablers can be categorised into five key dimensions: economic and financial; managerial and organisational; technological and infrastructural; policy and regulatory; and market and social. The study reveals two systemic patterns driving the transition: technology–policy interdependence and the conflicting relationship between large-scale production and value extraction. Our findings also presented a research agenda focusing on strategic value creation through material streams of automotive electronics, plastic, and composites with high potential value, and further insights are needed in regions such as the Middle East, Oceania, and the Americas. Organisations should consider Reverse Supply Chain as a strategic approach for securing critical material supplies, while policymakers could leverage the use of digital tools as the foundational infrastructure for subsidies allocation and prevent fraud.